Around 85 percent of the 100 network administrators surveyed in Tufin Technologies' 2011 Firewall Management report say that half of their firewall rule changes eventually need to be fixed because of improper setup. Just 7 percent say their firewall audit processes are automated, and 40 percent say they spend a month or more per year on handling firewall audits.
“We were surprised to learn that half the sample is still doing basic tasks manually, such as tightening up permissive rules, looking for shadowed rules or recertifying rules," said Shaul Efraim, vice president of marketing and business development at Tufin. "There is no benefit to having experienced administrators spend their days searching for needles in haystacks."
Close to half of the respondents pinpoint redundant rules manually, while 20 percent have no process for finding these redundancies. Around 43 percent say they manage firewall rules manually, and 41 percent say they don't have a way to determine when a firewall rule must be retired or fixed.
More than 20 percent say they knew of someone who cheated on a firewall audit, mainly due to lack of time. And 23 percent have never performed a firewall audit at all.
Close to 30 percent say it takes them several hours to change a firewall rule, and some 66 percent say their change management processes leave their organizations prone to breaches due to lack of formal processes (56 percent) aor nd manual processes with too many steps or people in the process (29 percent).
“Despite our success, this survey reveals the maturity curve for Security Lifecycle Management is still on the upswing,” said Efraim. “Without process automation, auditing network security systems -- especially as organizations continue to use more firewalls in virtualized environments and embrace Next Generation firewalls -- is simply not possible. 60% of the sample cited lack of time as the weakest link in their network security. If that is not business justification for automating fundamental but time consuming, error prone, network security processes, then what is?”
Tufin conducted the survey online. Forty percent of the respondents work for companies with up to 500 people and 30 percent with more than 5,000, in the telecommunications, financial services, energy, pharmaceuticals, and transportation industries.
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
Fundamentals of User Activity Monitoring
Benchmarking normal activity and then monitoring for users who stray from that norm is an essential strategy for getting ahead of potential data and system breaches. But choosing the right tools is only part of the effort. Without sufficient training, efficient deployment and a good response plan, attackers could gain the upper hand.
Does SIEM Make Sense For Your Company?
A security information and event management system serves as a repository for all the security alerts and logging systems
from a firm's devices. But this can be overkill for a company that is understaffed or has overestimated its security information needs. In this report, we discuss 10 questions to ask yourself in determining whether SIEM makes sense for
you--and how to pick the right system if it does.
Monitoring Tools and Logs Make All The Difference
It's no longer a matter of "if" you get hacked, but when. In this special report, we take a look at ways to measure your security posture and the challenges that lie ahead with the emerging threat landscape.
Other reports from the Security Monitoring Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Security Management 2.0: Time to Replace Your SIEM?
Is it time? Are you waving the white flag? Has your first gen SIEM failed to meet expectations despite your investment? If you are questioning whether your existing product or service can get the job done, you are not alone. Read this Securosis white paper to learn how easy it can be to replace your SIEM with a next generation solution.
IT Executive Guide to Security Intelligence: Transitioning from SIEM to Total Security Intelligence
Read this whitepaper to learn how adopting a next generation SIEM solution provides security intelligence, to allow organizations to maintain comprehensive and cost-effective information security. Discover how security intelligence enables critical concerns in five key areas: Data silo consolidation, threat detection, fraud discovery, risk assessment/risk management, and regulatory compliance.
The Return on Security of QRadar: Improving Operational Efficiencies in Federal Government
In this study, IANS interviewed two Q1 Labs customers using QRadar to assess their Return On Security (ROS). The two customers were providers of service to the U.S. Government and had highly secure environments dealing with extremely sensitive data. The data yielded from the interviews showed substantial benefit to the organizations for the cost, both in money and staff time.
SANS What Works Webcast: Worldwide Retailer Boosts Privacy with Security Intelligence
A leading retailer with stores worldwide was seeking a more innovative tool to protect customer privacy and intellectual property. PCI compliance mandated log collection, but a vast number of different tools generated an overwhelming amount of log data, making it difficult for the small security team to review it effectively. The solution the company chose had to fit into a diverse network, provide intelligent reporting and offer a centralized management console.
Learn How Security Intelligence Can Help Combat WikiLeaks Stuxnet and Advanced Threats
WikiLeaks and Stuxnet have illustrated a few fundamental IT security issues that have underscored the need for Total Security Intelligence to counter advanced threats and to detect anomalous behavior. See how government and commercial organizations are using QRadar as an integral component of their IT security program to identify emerging threats based on context and situational awareness.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>