Meanwhile, DDoS attacks against ISPs have hit a new high, breaking the 100-Gbps barrier, and application-layer attacks continue to rise beyond HTTP, with attacks against HTTPS, SMTP, and VOIP, Arbor Networks' 2010 Infrastructure Security Report found. And with the wave of attacks on high-profile commercial websites in the wake of the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, DDoS has become more of a household name.
"Some said 2009 was the year of DDoS. But 2010 is the year DDoS went mainstream," says Carlos Morales, vice president of sales engineering for Arbor. "2010 is when DDoS became more noted in the public conscience .. It's the tool of choice for protest now and political/ideological motivation."
And it's becoming more frequent, affecting larger pieces of networks, companies, countries, and their economies, he says. "What was once more of a mosquito bite is now more of a shark attack," Morales says. Arbor's report draws from a survey of mostly service providers (57 percent), as well as content and application service providers, enterprises, and mobile, broadband, and DNS providers, and educational organizations worldwide.
The outages due to incidents suffered by mobile providers come as no surprise given the wireless explosion. Most mobile providers have been on a tear to grow their services, but security hasn't kept up. "They are a full decade behind in defense and the capabilities they should have in place," Morales says.
Only 23 percent of the wireless provider respondents say they can view their wireless packet networks as well as or better than their wired ones.
On the wired side, DDoS attacks have been on a 102 percent increase year-over-year, according to the report, and up 1,000 percent from when Arbor first reported on this in 2005. And DDoS attackers are moving beyond the traditional, too-conspicuous SYN flood attacks, to more application-layer attacks. While HTTP and DNS are the top two DDoS targets, DDoS attacks are also now going after HTTP-S, SMTP mail, and VoIP (via SIP) applications, the report says. Around 77 percent of the respondents say they experienced application-layer attacks last year.
"It's all about what's available for them to infiltrate. If you lock the doors, someone is going to come through the window," Morales says. "SYN and other [lower-layer] attacks can get a lot of bandwidth and are easy to distinguish from other traffic. Application attacks may not be as easy to distinguish because they don't take a lot of infrastructure to do."
And nearly 70 percent of these network providers get hit by at least one DDoS attack each month, while 35 percent see 10 or more per month.
"Another factor is that operators, in general, aren't keeping up with attackers," Morales says. And firewalls, IDS, and IPS devices are frequently targeted, he says.
A full copy of the Arbor report is available here.
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
Fundamentals of User Activity Monitoring
Benchmarking normal activity and then monitoring for users who stray from that norm is an essential strategy for getting ahead of potential data and system breaches. But choosing the right tools is only part of the effort. Without sufficient training, efficient deployment and a good response plan, attackers could gain the upper hand.
Does SIEM Make Sense For Your Company?
A security information and event management system serves as a repository for all the security alerts and logging systems
from a firm's devices. But this can be overkill for a company that is understaffed or has overestimated its security information needs. In this report, we discuss 10 questions to ask yourself in determining whether SIEM makes sense for
you--and how to pick the right system if it does.
Monitoring Tools and Logs Make All The Difference
It's no longer a matter of "if" you get hacked, but when. In this special report, we take a look at ways to measure your security posture and the challenges that lie ahead with the emerging threat landscape.
Other reports from the Security Monitoring Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Security Management 2.0: Time to Replace Your SIEM?
Is it time? Are you waving the white flag? Has your first gen SIEM failed to meet expectations despite your investment? If you are questioning whether your existing product or service can get the job done, you are not alone. Read this Securosis white paper to learn how easy it can be to replace your SIEM with a next generation solution.
IT Executive Guide to Security Intelligence: Transitioning from SIEM to Total Security Intelligence
Read this whitepaper to learn how adopting a next generation SIEM solution provides security intelligence, to allow organizations to maintain comprehensive and cost-effective information security. Discover how security intelligence enables critical concerns in five key areas: Data silo consolidation, threat detection, fraud discovery, risk assessment/risk management, and regulatory compliance.
The Return on Security of QRadar: Improving Operational Efficiencies in Federal Government
In this study, IANS interviewed two Q1 Labs customers using QRadar to assess their Return On Security (ROS). The two customers were providers of service to the U.S. Government and had highly secure environments dealing with extremely sensitive data. The data yielded from the interviews showed substantial benefit to the organizations for the cost, both in money and staff time.
SANS What Works Webcast: Worldwide Retailer Boosts Privacy with Security Intelligence
A leading retailer with stores worldwide was seeking a more innovative tool to protect customer privacy and intellectual property. PCI compliance mandated log collection, but a vast number of different tools generated an overwhelming amount of log data, making it difficult for the small security team to review it effectively. The solution the company chose had to fit into a diverse network, provide intelligent reporting and offer a centralized management console.
Learn How Security Intelligence Can Help Combat WikiLeaks Stuxnet and Advanced Threats
WikiLeaks and Stuxnet have illustrated a few fundamental IT security issues that have underscored the need for Total Security Intelligence to counter advanced threats and to detect anomalous behavior. See how government and commercial organizations are using QRadar as an integral component of their IT security program to identify emerging threats based on context and situational awareness.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>