News
Guest Blog // Selected Security Content Provided By Intel
What's This?
10/22/2013
04:38 PM
Tom Quillin
Tom Quillin
Guest Blogs
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Security and Identity Management: Innovative Authentication Techniques

Today I want to take a closer look at identity. Most people will tell you things are pretty bad today, but things have improved quite a lot.

In my last blog, I broke down security pain points into four categories. Today I want to take a closer look at identity. Most people will tell you things are pretty bad today, but things have improved quite a lot since nobles dispatched their missives authenticated with rings impressed into wax. One needed a ring, a unique seal, and a load of wax. Not to mention recipients sufficiently well-trained to distinguish your seal from fakes. So today, with our richer toolkits - instantaneous communications, unlimited computing power in the cloud, and even ginormous touch screens in every purse and jacket pocket. So what the heck is going on? With amazing technology advances of the last decades, how does identity remain a problem?

Scale might be the most important complication. Today about 6 billion devices are internet connected, and as the so-called internet of things scales, some project 50 billion devices to connect by 2020. Even if we wanted to issue all the human users unique rings and hot wax, we'd still be left with the challenge of identifying the remaining billions of devices which lack the prehensile abilities required to hold and impress ring into wax. Today large public suppliers authenticate more users in seconds than the royal seal examiners did in lifetimes. And the risks have scaled accordingly. In a world that runs on automated authentication decisions, adversaries have become better at exploiting gaps and weaknesses. Estimates place the cost of cybercrime to firms globally as high as $1 trillion. So if your users complain you're being paranoid, let them know you have just cause.

So let's look at it from our users' perspective for a moment. They're continually consumed trying to remember usernames and password for a multitude of accounts - both business and personal. Names of first grade teachers, first pets, first cars. Text messages with one time passwords. And still we lack confidence and suffer risk of fraud as sophisticated malware can hijack the most closely guarded user-provided credential. And then we complicate things with byzantine rules and guidelines for creating and changing passwords. It all would be comical - if our guidelines weren't making it impossible for users to get their work done! So now we're all miserable, if united in our misery.

What if it wasn't like this? What if we could simultaneously simplify life for users while at the same time increasing confidence in authentication decisions? What would it take to build authentication systems less vulnerable to compromise when an end-user was tricked into revealing a password?

There's no mystery around the framework for solutions. It's quite possible to design architectures for robust solutions that rely on all three of the traditional elements of authentication (something you know, something you have, something you are). At the September 2012 Intel Developer Forum, Intel's Chief Technology Officer, Justin Rattner, demonstrated the ability to augment conventional passwords and tokens with the more robust schemes. Justin demonstrated a user walking up to a device and using biometric sensors to locally authenticate a user, then providing attestation to a service provider that user has successfully authenticated. I think it would be great if these types of solutions were broadly available, delivered in solutions that were reliable, difficult to compromise, straightforward to manage and scale for large user populations, and - most importantly - simple for users! While some companies have delivered pieces of the puzzle, it's still too tough for relying parties to stitch together a high quality fabric for authentication and decision making that's easy for users. It may not be rings and wax seals, but we have some distance to go.

It would be great to hear your thoughts on these approaches. What are the biggest challenges you're facing in balancing the robust and simple? Where can the industry do a better job solving your needs? (Hey and vendors, please, no blatant product promos).

Tom Quillin is the Director of Cyber Security for Technologies and Initiatives at Intel Corp. He is responsible for identifying security risks, as well as contributing to product planning that addresses future security challenges. He also manages Intel's policy positions on ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
12/15/2013 | 12:54:44 PM
re: Security and Identity Management: Innovative Authentication Techniques
suggested reading: FTC position on Data Breaches

http://www.computerworld.com/s...

Notes

1. the o/s maker should assume responsibility for the integrity of the o/s: no un-authorized updates.

2. once the o/s is secured then customers can apply security rules to make un-authorized access difficult.

3. the most important security rule lies in controlling what an application program can access or update.
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
12/13/2013 | 1:33:03 PM
re: Security and Identity Management: Innovative Authentication Techniques
Slamming shut the door
1. secure the o/s. an app program should not be able to corrupt its host os. the technology for this has been available for many years.
2. restrict application program activity: by application: what directories are permitted for read,write, and execute? is network access allowed?

the typical user workstation today is as lawless as a drunken old west cowboy town on saturday night.
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
11/13/2013 | 1:21:26 PM
re: Security and Identity Management: Innovative Authentication Techniques
"There's a Time and a Place for Everything". So it is on the 'Net: In some cases you should be anonymous; in other cases you need secure communication and established credentials -- in both directions.

Business Computing -- banking, shopping, and such -- need the secure communications and established credentials.

I have felt for some time that we have attempted to simply adapt the pen and paper methods of authentication to our new digital network environment -- with less than stellar success. While PGP(GnuPG) has been available for a bit more than 20 years -- we have not moved to make advantage of it. We just need to take it out of the box marked "esoteric" -- and assign it a class number for 7th grade. This would be much more valuable than,.....(e.g.) algebra

When you are ready to add commercial/business computing to your activities -- you should generate your PGP/GnuPG keypair and start establishing your Trust Model. Learning to establish and maintain a Trust Model is a critical skill. PGP/GnuPG signatures can go a long way to reducing fraud.

However, as Phill Zimmerman noted in his original essay, none of this is of any use if your computer has been compromised with un-authorized programming.
gluu
50%
50%
gluu,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/31/2013 | 3:41:20 PM
re: Security and Identity Management: Innovative Authentication Techniques
+1 to this commentary.

There is a triangle of price-security-cost , and we're seeing that we're getting "bigger triangles"--authn mechanisms that are easier to use, more secure, and cheaper.

One consideration is price... 2fa is great but management is not used to paying for authentication--there was no license fee for username/password authn. The good news is that companies can use some "free" methods to better authentication people: http://www.gluu.co/.icn4

Also, the API a domain uses to publish the authn mechanism is a critical part of the equation. Another blog I wrote took a contrarian view that two-factor is not the answer... http://www.gluu.co/2fa_not_the...
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-0334
Published: 2014-10-31
Bundler before 1.7, when multiple top-level source lines are used, allows remote attackers to install arbitrary gems by creating a gem with the same name as another gem in a different source.

CVE-2014-2334
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web User Interface in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.7 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2336.

CVE-2014-2335
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web User Interface in Fortinet FortiManager before 5.0.7 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2336.

CVE-2014-2336
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web User Interface in Fortinet FortiManager before 5.0.7 and FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.7 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2334 and CVE-2014-2335.

CVE-2014-3366
Published: 2014-10-31
SQL injection vulnerability in the administrative web interface in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted response, aka Bug ID CSCup88089.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.