Risk

6/10/2010
04:51 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Tool Automates Social Engineering In Man-In-The-Middle Attack

Researchers demonstrate attack that dupes victims in online chats

French researchers have developed an automated social engineering tool that uses a man-in-the middle attack and strikes up online conversations with potential victims.

The proof-of-concept HoneyBot poses convincingly as a real human in Internet Relay Chats (IRC) and instant messaging sessions. It lets an attacker glean personal and other valuable information from victims via these chats, or lure them into clicking on malicious links. And the researchers had plenty of success in their tests: They were able to get users to click onto malicious links sent via their chat messages 76 percent of the time.

The researchers who created the PoC -- Tobias Lauinger, Veikko Pankakoski, Davide Balzarotti, and Engin Kirda, all of Institut EURECOM in France -- are also working on taking their creation a step further to automate social engineering attacks on social networks.

"By automatically crawling and correlating the information users store in social networks, we are able to collect detailed personal information about each user, which we use for automated profiling," Kirda says. "Having access to such information would allow an attacker to launch sophisticated, targeted attacks or to improve the efficiency of spam campaigns."

The researchers originally wrote their so-called HoneyBot PoC tool as a way to demonstrate large-scale automated social engineering attacks. While spammers typically send IM messages that attempt to lure users to click on their malicious links, these attacks are often fairly conspicuous and obvious to the would-be victim. "We wanted to see if it would be possible to automate social engineering and how effective they would be in practice. Our aim was to warn against a new threat posed by sophisticated [automated social engineering] bots and raise awareness about such attacks in practice," Kirda says.

Such an attack could occur via an online shopping website or bank site that contains an embedded chat window, the researchers say. An attacker then could set up a phishing site and wage a man-in-the-middle attack on the chat window. "The attacker [then] can read all the data that is entered by the victims and modify it before it is sent to the authentic support," Lauinger says.

It could also be used to distribute malware by setting up a malicious Web page that infects the user's machine, for example.

The researchers demonstrated an attack that works like this: The bot registers as a regular user of a chat service and initiates an online conversation with a real user, "Alice." If Alice sends a message back to the bot, then the bot forwards her message to another legitimate user, "Bob," while eavesdropping and directing their conversation.

"Instead of using artificial intelligence or some other form of logic to generate an answer, the bot just forwards Alice's message to a second human user, Bob," Lauinger says.

Alice and Bob think they're talking to a real IRC user, but it's really the bot. "The messages sent to that nickname are ultimately answered by another human user. That other user isn't aware of the bot, either, because the attack works exactly in the same way for both human users that are involved in the attack."

The Python-based HoneyBot tool can automatically connect and disconnect from IRC channels and execute multiple attacks. It also speaks English, French, and Italian. The tool was first revealed publicly in April at the Usenix LEET symposium, where Lauinger presented the team's paper (PDF) -- and the researchers plan to detail their social networking enhancements in September at the Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID) 2010 Symposium in Ottawa.

The researchers also conducted a limited experiment with the tool on Facebook, mainly to prove it was possible. Lauinger says Facebook would be a more lucrative attack surface for a bad guy because of the large number of novice users and the wealth of private and sensitive data there. An attacker could build a phony profile and go from there: "If an attacker manages to clone two profiles and get on the friend list of the respective authentic user, it could forward messages between the fake and authentic profiles," he says. "If the real users chat with the fake profile instead of the real one, the attacker could spy on the messages that are exchanged and modify them, as in our social engineering attack."

Meanwhile, the researchers say they were surprised by how long the bot was able to successfully engage users. "We had the feeling that a man-in-the-middle bot attack would work well in practice. However, we did not think that we would be able to sustain the conversation between some users for several hours," Balzarotti says. "Also, we were surprised that many users clicked on links, although some IRC channels explicitly warned them against clicking on links."

Defending against an automated social engineering attack isn't easy: Social engineering, by nature, is all about human nature, and there's no patch for that. Heuristic detection can at least flag users of suspicious behavior, but slick attacker can find a way to evade it, the researchers say.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
'Hidden Tunnels' Help Hackers Launch Financial Services Attacks
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/20/2018
Inside a SamSam Ransomware Attack
Ajit Sancheti, CEO and Co-Founder, Preempt,  6/20/2018
Tesla Employee Steals, Sabotages Company Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  6/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-12716
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-25
The API service on Google Home and Chromecast devices before mid-July 2018 does not prevent DNS rebinding attacks from reading the scan_results JSON data, which allows remote attackers to determine the physical location of most web browsers by leveraging the presence of one of these devices on its l...
CVE-2018-12705
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
DIGISOL DG-BR4000NG devices have XSS via the SSID (it is validated only on the client side).
CVE-2018-12706
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
DIGISOL DG-BR4000NG devices have a Buffer Overflow via a long Authorization HTTP header.
CVE-2018-12714
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 4.17.2. The filter parsing in kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c could be called with no filter, which is an N=0 case when it expected at least one line to have been read, thus making the N-1 index invalid. This allows attackers to cause a denial o...
CVE-2018-12713
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
GIMP through 2.10.2 makes g_get_tmp_dir calls to establish temporary filenames, which may result in a filename that already exists, as demonstrated by the gimp_write_and_read_file function in app/tests/test-xcf.c. This might be leveraged by attackers to overwrite files or read file content that was ...