Perimeter

9/15/2009
03:27 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Smart Card Alliance: End-To-End Encryption Won't Stop Credit-Card Fraud

Industry association proposes contactless chip cards, says end-to-end encryption isn't enough

The Smart Card Alliance has taken a stand against pure end-to-end encryption as a way to protect credit-card transactions, publishing a position paper this week calling instead for contactless chip cards with dynamic cryptograms.

Merchants and payment processors are under pressure to make changes in how customer card data is protected in the wake of major data breaches over the past two years, such as that of Heartland Payment Systems, which have exposed millions of customer credit and debit cards. The electronic payment industry is considering the adoption of a new ANSI standard, and Heartland is pushing for it to embrace end-to-end encryption of cardholder data.

"End-to-end encryption is designed to protect static data. As long as the transaction data is static, this is another way of combating fraud," says Randy Vanderhoof, executive director of the Smart Card Alliance. But when card data is being entered into a point-of-sale system (POS), for instance, it's still at risk, he says.

"It's like putting a steel door on a grass hut," he says. "Fraudsters will find other ways to get at that static data before it gets there, with things like skimming [the card data] as it's entered into the point of sale system, or cloning cards that are lost or stolen."

The alliance, whose members include Bank of America, MasterCard, Visa, HID Global Corporation, and the State Department, argues in its position paper that contactless chip cards with dynamic cryptograms for each transaction are a better solution than end-to-end encryption.

And if the industry does decide to adopt end-to-end encryption, the alliance recommends the standard allow for "globally-interoperable secure payment transactions using chip card technology in the future," the paper says.

The Smart Card Alliance's Vanderhoof says his organization's proposal is different from pure chip and PIN technology. "We're not advocating that the U.S. needs to go all the way to a full chip and PIN implementation, but chips with dynamic data like contactless payment cards that are on the market today," he says.

He says the proposal basically builds on existing "express" payment card programs from Visa, MasterCard, and American Express that provide more convenient and faster payment than traditional cards. These express cards use contactless card technology.

"The U.S. could see a significant change in fraud by introducing more dynamic data versus magnetic stripe data," Vanderhoof says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Veterans Find New Roles in Enterprise Cybersecurity
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/12/2018
Understanding Evil Twin AP Attacks and How to Prevent Them
Ryan Orsi, Director of Product Management for Wi-Fi at WatchGuard Technologies,  11/14/2018
7 Free (or Cheap) Ways to Increase Your Cybersecurity Knowledge
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/15/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
This report offers insight on how security professionals plan to invest in cybersecurity, and how they are prioritizing their resources. Find out what your peers have planned today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-18519
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-19
BestXsoftware Best Free Keylogger 5.2.9 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse "%PROGRAMFILES%\BFK 5.2.9\syscrb.exe" file because of insecure permissions for the BUILTIN\Users group.
CVE-2018-19355
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-19
modules/orderfiles/ajax/upload.php in the Customer Files Upload addon 2018-08-01 for PrestaShop (1.5 through 1.7) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading a php file via modules/orderfiles/upload.php with auptype equal to product (for upload destinations under modules/productfi...
CVE-2008-7320
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
** DISPUTED ** GNOME Seahorse through 3.30 allows physically proximate attackers to read plaintext passwords by using the quickAllow dialog at an unattended workstation, if the keyring is unlocked. NOTE: this is disputed by a software maintainer because the behavior represents a design decision.
CVE-2018-19358
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
GNOME Keyring through 3.28.2 allows local users to retrieve login credentials via a Secret Service API call and the D-Bus interface if the keyring is unlocked, a similar issue to CVE-2008-7320. One perspective is that this occurs because available D-Bus protection mechanisms (involving the busconfig...
CVE-2018-19351
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
Jupyter Notebook before 5.7.1 allows XSS via an untrusted notebook because nbconvert responses are considered to have the same origin as the notebook server. In other words, nbconvert endpoints can execute JavaScript with access to the server API. In notebook/nbconvert/handlers.py, NbconvertFileHand...