Risk

4/6/2010
04:30 PM
50%
50%

Researcher Details New Class Of Cross-Site Scripting Attack

'Meta-Information XSS' exploits commonly used network administration utilities

A new type of cross-site scripting (XSS) attack that exploits commonly used network administration tools could be putting users' data at risk, a researcher says.

Tyler Reguly, lead security research engineer at nCircle, today published a white paper outlining a new category of attack called "meta-information XSS" (miXSS), which works differently than other forms of the popular attack method -- and could be difficult to detect.

"Think about those network administration utilities that so many webmasters and SMB administrators rely on -- tools that perform a whois lookup, resolve DNS records, or simply query the headers of a Web server," the white paper states. "They're taking the meta-information provided by various services and displaying it within the rendered Website.

"These Web-based services introduce a class of XSS that can't be captured by the current categories."

Reguly explains that there are three current types of XSS attacks: reflected, persistent, and DOM-based.

"Reflected XSS refers to an attack that occurs when user input is reflected back at the user," he writes. "This means that you provide the malicious data as user input, and the Web application simply echoes the data back to you.

"Persistent XSS refers to an attack that stores user input, allowing it to affect a much broader scope of visitors. An attack may be stored in the database and displayed to all visitors, rather than just the visitor that provided the malicious input."

DOM-based XSS refers to attacks that modify the Document Object Model directly and don't require data in the HTTP response, Reguly says.

"None of these [categories] really captures the process that occurs when you are dealing with [miXSS]," the paper says. "With miXSS, the input that the user provides is completely valid and properly sanitized. This rules out reflected XSS, and since we aren't storing the user input, persistent XSS can also be disregarded. Finally, since we're not interacting with the DOM, we can eliminate this type of attack."

MiXSS has aspects of both reflected and persistent attacks, but does not fall into either category, Reguly explains. "It is valid user input provided to a service," he says. "The service then utilizes the user-provided data to gather data and display it for the user. It is in this data that the cross-site scripting occurs." Reguly offers an example: a DNS TXT record that contains [a certain value] and a service designed to gather DNS TXT records for the purpose of testing sender policy framework (SPF) records.

"The user provides the domain name pointing to the TXT record, while the service resolves the TXT data and displays the data to the user," the paper says. "Since the data contains JavaScript, the returned data is processed, and successful cross-site scripting has occurred."

The XSS vulnerability could be a growing threat in the future, Reguly says, because Web-based tools such as these are increasingly used to quickly resolve network administration issues that might otherwise inhibit the user experience, the paper says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Veterans Find New Roles in Enterprise Cybersecurity
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/12/2018
Understanding Evil Twin AP Attacks and How to Prevent Them
Ryan Orsi, Director of Product Management for Wi-Fi at WatchGuard Technologies,  11/14/2018
7 Free (or Cheap) Ways to Increase Your Cybersecurity Knowledge
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/15/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
This report offers insight on how security professionals plan to invest in cybersecurity, and how they are prioritizing their resources. Find out what your peers have planned today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2008-7320
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
** DISPUTED ** GNOME Seahorse through 3.30 allows physically proximate attackers to read plaintext passwords by using the quickAllow dialog at an unattended workstation, if the keyring is unlocked. NOTE: this is disputed by a software maintainer because the behavior represents a design decision.
CVE-2018-19358
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
GNOME Keyring through 3.28.2 allows local users to retrieve login credentials via a Secret Service API call and the D-Bus interface if the keyring is unlocked, a similar issue to CVE-2008-7320. One perspective is that this occurs because available D-Bus protection mechanisms (involving the busconfig...
CVE-2018-19351
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
Jupyter Notebook before 5.7.1 allows XSS via an untrusted notebook because nbconvert responses are considered to have the same origin as the notebook server. In other words, nbconvert endpoints can execute JavaScript with access to the server API. In notebook/nbconvert/handlers.py, NbconvertFileHand...
CVE-2018-19352
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
Jupyter Notebook before 5.7.2 allows XSS via a crafted directory name because notebook/static/tree/js/notebooklist.js handles certain URLs unsafely.
CVE-2018-19353
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
The ansilove_ansi function in loaders/ansi.c in libansilove 1.0.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted file.