Risk

New Proxy Promises To Shield Users From Google Data Collection

GoogleSharing is an anonymizing proxy service that pools user search data, security researcher says

Even before news broke of its hack in China, Google was making some privacy-conscious users nervous in its efforts to analyze searching behavior. This week, a security researcher has launched a new tool designed to ease that concern.

GoogleSharing is a free service that "anonymizes" Google searches by creating a shared proxy that pools the search results of many users, making it difficult for Google to tell what each individual's behavior might be.

Developed by security researcher Moxie Marlinspike, the proxy service is designed to put the brakes on Google's collection of users' behavioral data.

"If you're like most Internet users, Google knows more about you than you might be comfortable with," the GoogleSharing site says. "Whether you were logged in to a Google account or not, they know everything you've ever searched for, what search results you clicked on, what news you read, and every place you've ever gotten directions to.

"Most of the time, thanks to things like Google Analytics, they even know which websites you visited that you didn't reach through Google. If you use Gmail, they know the content of every email you've ever sent or received, whether you've deleted it or not."

This sort of data collection is a worry for many users, particularly after news of Google's hack in China hit the Web, Marlinspike says.

"That kind of news increases the importance of tools, like GoogleSharing, given that it adds weight to the speculation of Google running automated intercept systems for law enforcement," Marlinspike says. "Even if you trust Google and the U.S. government with your information, collecting that much data in one place is just going to be an increasingly attractive target for hackers and foreign governments. And the hackers always win."

GoogleSharing is designed to prevent Google from collecting information about users from services that don't require a login, the site says. Once set up, it works just like regular Google searching, without requiring the use of a special site.

The GoogleSharing system consists of a custom proxy and a Firefox add-on, the site says. The proxy works by generating a pool of GoogleSharing "identities," each of which contains a cookie issued by Google and an arbitrary user agent for one of several popular browsers. The Firefox add-on watches for requests to Google services from your browser, then redirects them to a GoogleSharing proxy. There the request is stripped of all identifying information and replaced with the information from a GoogleSharing identity.

"The GoogleShared request is then forwarded on to Google, and the response is proxied back to you," the site says. "Your next request will get a different identity, and the one you were using before will be assigned to someone else. By 'sharing' these identities, all of our traffic gets mixed together and is very difficult to analyze."

Robert Hansen, CEO of consulting firm SecTheory and a well-known researcher, says GoogleSharing is a good idea, but could be limited in its impact.

"I think it's potentially a fine service for those who are only concerned about search," he says. "Unfortunately, there are a lot of other products in this space that Google could use to track their users that GoogleSharing explicitly says they do not attempt to proxy."

Some users could also be worried about using a service developed by Marlinspike, who has done "most of the man-in-the-middle [hacking] research of note," Hansen observes. "The person paranoid enough about Google watching them is going to also be paranoid about the guy who does man-in-the-middle research watching them, too," Hansen says.

Some corporations also frown on the use of anonymizing proxies, which might obscure information they collect about employees' use of the Internet while at work, experts observe.

In light of the recent hacks in China, however, Hansen praised GoogleSharing for helping to raise consciousness about potential threats to Google and its users.

"I, for one, am really glad guys like Moxie are starting to put focus on how dangerous Google's databases are," Hansen says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
High Stress Levels Impacting CISOs Physically, Mentally
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/14/2019
Valentine's Emails Laced with Gandcrab Ransomware
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
New Free Tool Scans for Chrome Extension Safety
Dark Reading Staff 2/21/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-1944
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2 through 5.2.4.1 Virtual Appliance contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-For...
CVE-2018-1945
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2 through 5.2.4.1 Virtual Appliance could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click act...
CVE-2018-1946
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2 through 5.2.4.1 Virtual Appliance supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the stronges...
CVE-2018-1947
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2 through 5.2.4.1 Virtual Appliance is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure withi...
CVE-2018-1948
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2 through 5.2.4.1 Virtual Appliance does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. Attackers may be able to get the cookie values by sending a http:// link to a user or by planting this link in a site the user goes to...