Endpoint

9/10/2009
03:46 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New iPhone Anti-Phishing Feature Fails

Researchers discover iPhone OS 3.1's anti-phishing feature is not working properly

The new Apple iPhone OS 3.1 software comes with a new anti-phishing feature for the Mobile Safari browser, but researchers say the filter doesn't work.

"I've not been able to get it to block anything," says Michael Sutton, vice president of research at Zscaler, who has been testing the mobile browser's security feature against several phishing sites identified on PhishTank. While Apple's Safari for the desktop blocks many of the sites, the iPhone's mobile version didn't block any that he tested.

Sutton says it's either a bug in the OS 3.1 software, or the new iPhone software just runs a pared-down version of the Safari browser's security feature. "OS 3.1 has settings in the Safari browser for turning on and off phishing protection, but it's just not [working]," Sutton says.

Apple had touted the new iPhone OS 3.0's anti-phishing feature, but Sutton says the feature was a no-show once the software was released in June, and he assumed the feature had just landed on the cutting floor.

Meanwhile, The Mac Security Blog is also reporting problems with the iPhone's anti-phishing feature, which is supposed to warn users when they visit a known malicious Website and ask them if they want to continue. "We have extensively tested this feature, tossing dozens of phishing URLs at it, and it simply does not seem to work. URLs that are blocked by Safari in Mac OS X open and direct users to malicious pages," they wrote.

Meanwhile, The Mac Security Blog says some people who have tested the feature have reported that it works for them, while others say it's not working. "We've tried isolating locations, iPhone/iPod touch models, and whether they are connecting over a cell network or via wifi, but all we've come up with is that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. This is clearly more dangerous than no protection at all, because if users think they are protected, they are less careful about which links they click," they blogged.

"If two people go to the same phishing site [and only one gets warned], there's clearly something wrong here," Zscaler's Sutton says.

Apple has been under fire for the barebones antivirus feature it included with Snow Leopard, its new version of OS X, which security experts say is inferior to available AV offerings.

Zscaler's Sutton says the fact that Apple attempted to secure the mobile browser is a plus: "On one hand, I'm encouraged," he says. "It's been an issue of mine for a while that mobile browsers don't have security built in."

But the worry is that since Apple is selling the new iPhone OS as having a phishing protection feature and it's not working, iPhone users are getting a false sense of security. "I applaud them for being the first to try to implement security features," he says. "But it appears they didn't do it right."

Apple had not responded to a request for comment on the issue as of this posting.

But even if the iPhone browser's anti-phishing feature was in working order, it couldn't stop a targeted attack, says Joshua Perrymon, CEO of PacketFocus. "What the browser will do is alert on known phishing attacks that are blacklisted, along with limited heuristics to identify other phishing attacks. It will do nothing for directed, custom attacks -- and these are the most damaging to an organization because most are never detected," Perrymon says.

"Also, mobile email is a great target for attackers because of this limited protection. There may be a small chance that desktop software may identify a phishing attack, but current mobile smartphones aren't really protected at all," he says.

Perrymon says while anti-phishing is a "good idea" for the iPhone, don't expect such a feature to protect users against any "real" attacks.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-20735
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in BMC PATROL Agent through 11.3.01. It was found that the PatrolCli application can allow for lateral movement and escalation of privilege inside a Windows Active Directory environment. It was found that by default the PatrolCli / PATROL Agent application only...
CVE-2019-0624
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
A spoofing vulnerability exists when a Skype for Business 2015 server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted request, aka "Skype for Business 2015 Spoofing Vulnerability." This affects Skype.
CVE-2019-0646
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Team Foundation Server does not properly sanitize user provided input, aka "Team Foundation Server Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability." This affects Team.
CVE-2019-0647
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Team Foundation Server does not properly handle variables marked as secret, aka "Team Foundation Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Team.
CVE-2018-20727
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
Multiple command injection vulnerabilities in NeDi before 1.7Cp3 allow authenticated users to execute code on the server side via the flt parameter to Nodes-Traffic.php, the dv parameter to Devices-Graph.php, or the tit parameter to drawmap.php.