Risk
9/16/2009
03:52 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Microsoft Gives Away Free Fuzzer, Secure Development Tool

More Security Development Lifecycle tools, ROI paper released

Microsoft continued efforts to spread its own secure software development program with today's release of a free fuzzer and tool for analyzing binary code.

The software giant last year began opening up its Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) for all third-party application developers and enterprises as a way to write cleaner, more secure code. As part of its SDL-sharing strategy, Microsoft has released several free tools for developers, including the SDL Threat Modeling Tool, the !exploitable (pronounced "bang exploitable") Crash Analyzer, an add-on to Microsoft's Windows debugger fuzzing tool; and the SDL Process Template, which integrates Microsoft's SDL directly into third-party and enterprise development environments.

Microsoft's latest tools -- BinScope Binary Analyzer and Mini-Fuzz File Fuzzer -- support the verification stage of the SDL process. "This is the testing phase," says David Ladd, principal security program manager for Microsoft's SDL team. Microsoft also released a white paper on how to manually integrate the SDL Process Template into its existing Visual Studio Team System development projects.

Along with iSEC Partners, the company also released a new report on how to measure the ROI of an SDL program. The report, which includes data from NIST studies and anecdotal data from iSEC, demonstrates how to use metrics to calculate an ROI: "The earlier you can find bugs, the cheaper it's going to be for development organizations," Ladd says.

BinScope Binary Analyzer is an in-house Microsoft tool that analyzes binary source code to ensure the code has flags set for detecting buffer overflows, data execution, and other potential vulnerabilities. The Mini-Fuzz File Fuzzer automatically runs various tests at the code to spot unexpected behaviors that could make it vulnerable.

"It looks for unplanned behavior...and analyzes if there are any security ramifications," he says. "This is our attempt to get more people exposed to fuzzing as a test procedure. Unfortunately, there are not a lot of folks using fuzzing, so we hope give people a low barrier-to-entry tool."

Security experts say Microsoft's open sharing of its SDL process and tools is a good thing. "It can't hurt. It's nice to see them sharing a little of what they have been bragging about for five years," says HD Moore, creator of Metasploit and director of security for BreakingPoint Systems.

"We strongly believe that taking advantage of our SDL tools will make a secure computing experience for everyone -- not just Microsoft [products]," Microsoft's Ladd says.

And Microsoft will continue to develop and roll out secure development tools in the future, he says. "There will always be more tools to come," he says. "Periodically, we will [look at] what we have available [in-house] and what does the threat environment look like? If there's a new threat, we may have to build new tools to address it." Meanwhile, in the new "Microsoft SDL: Return-on-Investment" guide, Microsoft and iSEC Partners include an example of how an organization would save $437,000 in one project, for an ROI of $350,000.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Senior Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise Magazine, ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-5704
Published: 2014-04-15
The mod_headers module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.22 allows remote attackers to bypass "RequestHeader unset" directives by placing a header in the trailer portion of data sent with chunked transfer coding. NOTE: the vendor states "this is not a security issue in httpd as such."

CVE-2013-5705
Published: 2014-04-15
apache2/modsecurity.c in ModSecurity before 2.7.6 allows remote attackers to bypass rules by using chunked transfer coding with a capitalized Chunked value in the Transfer-Encoding HTTP header.

CVE-2014-0341
Published: 2014-04-15
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in PivotX before 2.3.9 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title field to (1) templates_internal/pages.tpl, (2) templates_internal/home.tpl, or (3) templates_internal/entries.tpl; (4) an event field to ob...

CVE-2014-0342
Published: 2014-04-15
Multiple unrestricted file upload vulnerabilities in fileupload.php in PivotX before 2.3.9 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code by uploading a file with a (1) .php or (2) .php# extension, and then accessing it via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-0348
Published: 2014-04-15
The Artiva Agency Single Sign-On (SSO) implementation in Artiva Workstation 1.3.x before 1.3.9, Artiva Rm 3.1 MR7, Artiva Healthcare 5.2 MR5, and Artiva Architect 3.2 MR5, when the domain-name option is enabled, allows remote attackers to login to arbitrary domain accounts by using the corresponding...

Best of the Web