Perimeter
11/8/2012
10:59 AM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

M3AAWG Issues DKIM New Best Practices In Wake of Disclosed Key Length Vulnerability

M3AAWG is calling on business enterprises to replace previously secure 512- and 768-bit verification keys with 1024-bit and higher encryption

San Francisco, Nov. 6, 2012 – With the recently revealed ability to spoof email from companies that are using an outdated, weak encryption key to authenticate their email, the Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group is urging companies to adjust their DKIM processes immediately to improve end-user safeguards and today issued new best practices that specifically address the vulnerability. M3AAWG is calling on business enterprises to replace previously secure 512- and 768-bit verification keys with 1024-bit and higher encryption, among other recommendations to better validate the authenticity of who is sending an email.

"We've developed a short, succinct paper that explains the relatively simple and immediate steps large-scale senders can take to safeguard their brands in response to recent concerns about some levels of key encryption and usage. Technology is advancing, and to keep pace with hackers, the industry needs to revisit its practices in light of their expanding capabilities. We want to get the word out on the quick changes companies can make to protect consumers and their brands against this issue," Chris Roosenraad, M3AAWG Co-Chairman said.

"M3AAWG Best Practices for Implementing DKIM To Avoid Key Length Vulnerability," details the technical steps that address the current vulnerabilities and is available in the Published Documents section of the organization's website at www.m3aawg.org/published-documents. The recommendations include:

· Updating to a minimum 1024-bit key length. Shorter keys can be cracked in 72 hours using inexpensive cloud services

· Rotating keys quarterly

· Setting signatures to expire after the current key rotation period and revoking old keys in the DNS

· Using the key test mode only for a short time period and revoking the test key after the ramp-up

· Implementing DMARC in monitoring mode and using DNS to monitor how frequently keys are queried. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is another standard often used in conjunction with DKIM

· Using DKIM rather than Domain Keys, which is a depreciated protocol

· Working with any third parties hired to send a company's email to ensure they are adhering to these best practices

DKIM is a widely accepted standard used by businesses, governmental agencies, large email provider services and other entities that allows an organization to claim responsibility for sending a message in a way that can be validated by a recipient. For example, email services, such as AOL, Gmail and Yahoo, and commercial brands implement the standard as part of their messaging protocol. It includes an encrypted key in the message headers that ISPs and other receivers use to verify the message actually was sent by the referenced company.

Implementing DKIM makes it more difficult for criminals to forge illegitimate emails that are made to look like they came from a recognized company, a ruse that is often used to steal personal identity information from unsuspecting users. In late October, Wired journalist Kim Zetter reported that many companies were using weak encryption keys and other questionable practices as part of their DKIM implementation that could expose their email to this potential spoofing by cybercriminals.

About the Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group (M3AAWG)

The Messaging, Malware and Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group (M3AAWG) is where the industry comes together to work against bots, malware, spam, viruses, denial-of-service attacks and other online exploitation. M3AAWG (www.M3AAWG.org) represents more than one billion mailboxes from some of the largest network operators worldwide. It leverages the depth and experience of its global membership to tackle abuse on existing networks and new emerging services through technology, collaboration and public policy. It also works to educate global policy makers on the technical and operational issues related to online abuse and messaging. Headquartered in San Francisco, Calif., M3AAWG is an open forum driven by market needs and supported by major network operators and messaging providers.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-1774
Published: 2015-04-28
The HWP filter in LibreOffice before 4.3.7 and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 and Apache OpenOffice before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted HWP document, which triggers an out-of-bounds write.

CVE-2015-1863
Published: 2015-04-28
Heap-based buffer overflow in wpa_supplicant 1.0 through 2.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash), read memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted SSID information in a management frame when creating or updating P2P entries.

CVE-2015-3340
Published: 2015-04-28
Xen 4.2.x through 4.5.x does not initialize certain fields, which allows certain remote service domains to obtain sensitive information from memory via a (1) XEN_DOMCTL_gettscinfo or (2) XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist request.

CVE-2014-6090
Published: 2015-04-27
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) DataMappingEditorCommands, (2) DatastoreEditorCommands, and (3) IEGEditorCommands servlets in IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 SP6 before EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.3 before 6.0.3.0 iFix8, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.5 iFix...

CVE-2014-6092
Published: 2015-04-27
IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 before SP6 EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.6, and 6.0.5 before 6.0.5.6 requires failed-login handling for web-service accounts to have the same lockout policy as for standard user accounts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause...

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.