Perimeter
10/4/2012
04:33 PM
Eric Cole
Eric Cole
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Is Your Organization Doing Good Things Or Doing The Right Things?

Fixing vulnerabilities that are a real threat is the right thing to do

Organizations are spending significant resources on security and still getting compromised. The problem is that they are doing good things that will help build a solid security foundation, but they are not solving the right problems that will actually stop attacks.

The problem is that many organizations are misaligned with risk. The general formula for calculating risk is: risk = threat x vulnerabilities.

Looking at the formula, it is pretty obvious that if an organization wants to reduce a given risk, it would have to reduce one of the two items that are multiplied together. The question now is, which item does an organization control?

Threat is the potential for harm or what the offense is capable of doing. Vulnerabilities are defensive weaknesses that allow a threat to manifest itself. Organizations can control and reduce vulnerabilities; they have little control over the threats. Therefore, if you want to reduce risk, the way this is accomplished is by reducing the vulnerabilities. This is where the problem begins for many organizations.

Fixing random vulnerabilities is a good thing to do. Fixing vulnerabilities in which there is a real threat is the right thing to do.

Many organizations approach vulnerabilities as a numbers game. Organizations often say they will fix the low-hanging fruit weaknesses, or that 30 vulnerabilities reduced a month will keep the attackers away. The problem is that vulnerability reduction is a quality game, not a quantity game. It is better to fix five vulnerabilities in which there is a real threat than 50 in which there is no threat and therefore a minimal risk. Since there is no such thing as a vulnerable-free environment, any time spent on fixing random vulnerabilities is time that cannot be spent on fixing the highest priority vulnerabilities, which are those in which there is a real threat.

Therefore, in managing risk, threat drives the risk calculation and vulnerabilities drive risk reduction. Now the question is which threats to focus on. The answer is the threats that have the highest likelihood that are coupled with the vulnerabilities that have the biggest impact. By focusing in on threats, likelihood and impact to prioritize risk will allow organizations to fix the vulnerabilities that really matter, which will align an organization with the right defenses.

Dr. Eric Cole, Ph.D., is a security expert with more than 15 years of hands-on experience. Cole has experience in information technology with a focus on perimeter defense, secure network design, vulnerability discovery, penetration testing, and intrusion detection systems. He is the author of several books, including Hackers Beware, Hiding in Plain Site, Network Security Bible, and Insider Threat. He is the inventor of more than 20 patents, and is a researcher, writer, and speaker. Cole is a member of the Commission on Cyber Security for the 44th President and several executive advisory boards, and is CTO of the Americas for McAfee. Cole is involved with the SANS Technology Institute (STI) and SANS working with students, teaching, and maintaining and developing courseware. He is a SANS fellow, instructor, and course author. Dr. Cole has 20 years of hands-on experience in information technology with a focus on building out dynamic defense solutions that protect organizations from advanced threats. He has a Master's degree in computer science from NYIT and a Doctorate from Pace University, with a ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-6501
Published: 2015-03-30
The default soap.wsdl_cache_dir setting in (1) php.ini-production and (2) php.ini-development in PHP through 5.6.7 specifies the /tmp directory, which makes it easier for local users to conduct WSDL injection attacks by creating a file under /tmp with a predictable filename that is used by the get_s...

CVE-2014-9652
Published: 2015-03-30
The mconvert function in softmagic.c in file before 5.21, as used in the Fileinfo component in PHP before 5.4.37, 5.5.x before 5.5.21, and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, does not properly handle a certain string-length field during a copy of a truncated version of a Pascal string, which might allow remote atta...

CVE-2014-9653
Published: 2015-03-30
readelf.c in file before 5.22, as used in the Fileinfo component in PHP before 5.4.37, 5.5.x before 5.5.21, and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, does not consider that pread calls sometimes read only a subset of the available data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uninitialized memory ...

CVE-2014-9705
Published: 2015-03-30
Heap-based buffer overflow in the enchant_broker_request_dict function in ext/enchant/enchant.c in PHP before 5.4.38, 5.5.x before 5.5.22, and 5.6.x before 5.6.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that trigger creation of multiple dictionaries.

CVE-2014-9709
Published: 2015-03-30
The GetCode_ function in gd_gif_in.c in GD 2.1.1 and earlier, as used in PHP before 5.5.21 and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted GIF image that is improperly handled by the gdImageCreateFromGif function.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Good hackers--aka security researchers--are worried about the possible legal and professional ramifications of President Obama's new proposed crackdown on cyber criminals.