Perimeter

9/10/2012
09:35 AM
50%
50%

Great, Now We Have To Pee In The Boat

Spontaneous reactions can create unintended and costly compliance issues

Perhaps you know the old joke about the two thirsty fishermen, far out in the ocean in a small boat, who find a magic bottle. One of them naturally rubs the bottle, and out comes a genie offering them a single wish. Before they can discuss what they should ask for, one of the men quickly wishes the entire ocean were turned into beer. In an instant, the ocean became beer, and the genie was gone in a puff of smoke.

They sit staring at each other for a moment. The one who made the wish is grinning from ear to ear, basking in his great accomplishment of acquiring all the beer he could ever drink. Finally the one who had no say about the wish looks around, sighs, and says, "Great. Now we have to pee in the boat."

I find most organizations, just like the fishermen, put themselves in unpleasant situations, at least on occasion, as the result of spontaneous, unplanned actions. Likely there were no bodily functions involved, but many times the situation is something nearly as uncomfortable. Sometimes an initial action that seemed like a great idea at the time is executed without any serious consideration of its complete future impact. The cost of unintended consequences, even for well-intended actions, can be very high.

Many security and compliance issues are the result of ad hoc actions. In most cases, the original actions were well-meaning and on the surface seemed appropriate and maybe even necessary.

There are many clear examples, such as the network administrator who locks down firewalls to the point employees can’t get do their work and are forced to cheat the security. Perhaps it is the compliance officer who creates so many checks and balances that he has long forgotten what he is checking and balancing, but nonetheless creates endless, useless busy work for himself and his colleagues.

And we have all experienced the overly complex passwords, such as #E84ti~C0v, that are so inhuman we have to write them down, thus making them incredibly unsecure. These were all well-intended ideas that forced staff to essentially pee in the boat of their business’ compliance and security.

I realize not every decision requires a long evaluation and review cycle, which would be more paralyzing and dangerous than many quick-draw bad decisions. I suggest something we often say in our office: “The fastest way to do something is to do it right.” This usually requires a reasonable amount of forethought of eventual consequences. Any security or compliance personnel who can put some thought into their actions can help keep their business in great shape and moving along efficiently.

Glenn S. Phillips prefers that clients not have to pee in their boat. He is the president of Forte' Incorporated where he works with business leaders who want to leverage technology and understand the often hidden risks within. Glenn is the author of the book Nerd-to-English and you can find him on twitter at @NerdToEnglish.

Glenn works with business leaders who want to leverage technology and understand the often hidden risks awaiting them. The Founder and Sr. Consultant of Forte' Incorporated, Glenn and his team work with business leaders to support growth, increase profits, and address ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Google Engineering Lead on Lessons Learned From Chrome's HTTPS Push
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/8/2018
White Hat to Black Hat: What Motivates the Switch to Cybercrime
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/8/2018
PGA of America Struck By Ransomware
Dark Reading Staff 8/9/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Now about that mortgage refinance offer from Wells Fargo .....
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-3937
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
An exploitable command injection vulnerability exists in the measurementBitrateExec functionality of Sony IPELA E Series Network Camera G5 firmware 1.87.00. A specially crafted GET request can cause arbitrary commands to be executed. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability...
CVE-2018-3938
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
An exploitable stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the 802dot1xclientcert.cgi functionality of Sony IPELA E Series Camera G5 firmware 1.87.00. A specially crafted POST can cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a malicious POST r...
CVE-2018-12537
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
In Eclipse Vert.x version 3.0 to 3.5.1, the HttpServer response headers and HttpClient request headers do not filter carriage return and line feed characters from the header value. This allow unfiltered values to inject a new header in the client request or server response.
CVE-2018-12539
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
In Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.8, users other than the process owner may be able to use Java Attach API to connect to an Eclipse OpenJ9 or IBM JVM on the same machine and use Attach API operations, which includes the ability to execute untrusted native code. Attach API is enabled by default on Windows,...
CVE-2018-3615
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-14
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and Intel software guard extensions (Intel SGX) may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache from an enclave to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.