Perimeter
6/1/2010
12:27 PM
50%
50%

Facebook: Screw You, Privacy Hugger

As you know, Facebook recently overhauled its privacy controls -- or, well, overhauled the user interface to them. Upshot: Get over the privacy thing. But is that really what we want?

As you know, Facebook recently overhauled its privacy controls -- or, well, overhauled the user interface to them. Upshot: Get over the privacy thing. But is that really what we want?Facebook's take is that it has made material changes to make privacy restrictions easier to use. But while it's true certain elements of setting one's privacy on the vast social media network have changed, all of the underlying privacy models and business strategies have remained exactly as they were. In fact, Facebook sounds more entrenched in its indifference to privacy than ever.

A National Public Radio piece on the privacy control changes investigated Facebook users who had inadvertently placed information on display to the Internet and found that while they might not have been aware of how widely the information would be available, they weren't necessarily concerned about it. The NPR reporter used website Openbook.org to look for the phrase "my new cell phone number."

It's a great bit of radio. The reporter calls up a couple of inadvertent number posters. Here's the written summary from NPR:

Heidi Irbi in South Carolina was a little surprised that NPR was able to see her photo, her status update -- and her number. She thought that information went only to her Facebook "friends."

At the same time, Irbi says she doesn't really mind that her number went out to the rest of the world. Another woman whose number came up in the search, Judy Corley, was even less worried.

"I'm a gun-toting Texan, so I just don't have much concern about it," Corley says.

You have to love it: "I'm a gun-toting Texan..."

But note this, gun-toters: As far as I can tell, both the reporter and Heidi hung up the phone, logged in to Facebook, and changed their privacy settings. The Heidi Irbi in South Carolina who I can find doesn't share her status updates. None of the Corleys in Texas share theirs, either.

Ain't that peculiar.

I think most people (including these, according to the NPR piece) at least imagine they aren't handing over their personal information, as it were, lock, stock, and barrel. And that's not the default model Facebook uses, with or without the new user interface. More on the CSI view of privacy models here.

And one important omission from the NPR piece: If you search Openbook.org for "my new cell number," you'll find a lot more people saying "contact me for my new cell number" than you'll find people just throwing their cell numbers out into the world. How can that be if privacy is dead?

CSI Director Robert Richardson's new cell phone number is already far too widely distributed. Reach him via gocsi.com.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-2037
Published: 2014-11-26
Openswan 2.6.40 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and IKE daemon restart) via IKEv2 packets that lack expected payloads. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE 2013-6466.

CVE-2014-6609
Published: 2014-11-26
The res_pjsip_pubsub module in Asterisk Open Source 12.x before 12.5.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted headers in a SIP SUBSCRIBE request for an event package.

CVE-2014-6610
Published: 2014-11-26
Asterisk Open Source 11.x before 11.12.1 and 12.x before 12.5.1 and Certified Asterisk 11.6 before 11.6-cert6, when using the res_fax_spandsp module, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via an out of call message, which is not properly handled in the ReceiveFax dia...

CVE-2014-7141
Published: 2014-11-26
The pinger in Squid 3.x before 3.4.8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and crash) via a crafted type in an (1) ICMP or (2) ICMP6 packet.

CVE-2014-7142
Published: 2014-11-26
The pinger in Squid 3.x before 3.4.8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) ICMP or (2) ICMP6 packet size.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?