Risk

Design Flaws Make All Browsers Vulnerable, Black Hat Speaker Says

In series of hacks, researcher demonstrates inherent flaws in currently-used browsers

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA -- Black Hat USA 2010 -- If you ask Jeremiah Grossman, no Internet browser application is truly safe.

Click here for more of Dark Reading's Black Hat articles.

Grossman, CTO of Whitehat Security, described a series of browser design flaws in a presentation here last week. Internet Explorer 6 and 7, Safari, Firefox, and Google Chrome all showed some exploitable weaknesses, he said.

"These are not just application vulnerabilities that can be patched on the next rev," Grossman said. "These are basic design flaws."

In several cases, Grossman demonstrated how attackers can use the "auto-fill" and "auto-complete" features in several browsers to trick the browser into giving up personal information and password data from the user.

In other cases, he showed how cross-site scripting flaws can be used to gain access to the password manager features in Chrome and Firefox. A final demo described a method for swiftly evicting cookies from Firefox, making it easier to attack.

After so much browser research, does Grossman recommend one over the others? "IE 8 is technically secure, but it's targeted because it's so widespread," he said. "Firefox is not bad, but I outlined some design flaws in my talk. Chrome is also pretty good, but it comes with what amounts to Google spyware, and there's no sandbox."

Depending on what they're doing, some users may benefit from using more than one browser, taking advantage of the relative security capabilities of each, Grossman said. "One of my key points was just to get people away from using IE 6 and 7," he said. "There are still a lot of users of those out there."

Some users may want to think twice before using password manager features, too, Grossman says. "It's a pain to write them all down, but if your password manager is compromised, that can be a big problem," he said.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Devastating Cyberattack on Email Provider Destroys 18 Years of Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/12/2019
Up to 100,000 Reported Affected in Landmark White Data Breach
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-8354
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c has an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8355
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. In xmalloc.h, there is an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into the lsx_valloc macro that wraps malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in channels_start in remix.c.
CVE-2019-8356
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. One of the arguments to bitrv2 in fft4g.c is not guarded, such that it can lead to write access outside of the statically declared array, aka a stack-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8357
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c allows a NULL pointer dereference.
CVE-2013-2516
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
Vulnerability in FileUtils v0.7, Ruby Gem Fileutils <= v0.7 Command Injection vulnerability in user supplied url variable that is passed to the shell.