Risk
11/4/2009
07:03 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Corporate Breaches Increase Chances Of Consumer ID Theft, Study Says

When their data is leaked by a business, individuals are four times more likely to suffer identity theft, Javelin study says

Consumers who have received data breach notifications within the past year are at a much greater risk for fraud than typical consumers, according to a new study.

According to a report published last week by Javelin Research, individuals whose personal information has been compromised in a corporate breach are four times more likely to suffer identity theft or fraud. This result runs contrary to the common mantra among breached companies, which often say that they have no indication that the compromised data has been used by criminals.

"Data breach notifications are intended to help consumers take protective action," said Mary Monahan, managing partner and research director at Javelin. "Notification is critical because consumers are over four times more likely to encounter actual fraudulent transactions if they receive a data-breach notification."

But the Javelin study also indicates that most consumers don't see a direct relationship between breach notifications and identity theft.

"During each of the past three years, an average of 11 percent of consumers received a breach notification," Javelin said. "Slightly more than 33 percent of breach victims experienced exposure of their Social Security numbers, and 15 percent of breach victims had their ATM PINs compromised. [But] despite 19.5 percent of breach victims suffering some kind of fraud in the past year, only 2 percent attribute their fraud to the breach."

The Javelin report, "Data Breach Notifications: Victims Face Four Times Higher Risk of Fraud," is based on multiple years of data and includes updates on 2009 data breaches. The report also presents a timeline overview of the most recent and egregious data breaches in U.S. history, with recommendations for how individuals and companies can increase safety.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-3946
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)S allows remote attackers to bypass interface ACL restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending IPv6 packets in an unspecified scenario in which expected packet drops do not occur for "a small percentage" of the packets, aka Bug ID CSCty73682.

CVE-2012-5723
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco ASR 1000 devices with software before 3.8S, when BDI routing is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted (1) broadcast or (2) multicast ICMP packets with fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCub55948.

CVE-2013-6738
Published: 2014-04-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM SmartCloud Analytics Log Analysis 1.1 and 1.2 before 1.2.0.0-CSI-SCALA-IF0003 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an invalid query parameter in a response from an OAuth authorization endpoint.

CVE-2014-0188
Published: 2014-04-24
The openshift-origin-broker in Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2.0.5, 1.2.7, and earlier does not properly handle authentication requests from the remote-user auth plugin, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and impersonate arbitrary users via the X-Remote-User header in a request to...

CVE-2014-2391
Published: 2014-04-24
The password recovery service in Open-Xchange AppSuite before 7.2.2-rev20, 7.4.1 before 7.4.1-rev11, and 7.4.2 before 7.4.2-rev13 makes an improper decision about the sensitivity of a string representing a previously used but currently invalid password, which allows remote attackers to obtain potent...

Best of the Web