Risk //

Compliance

6/3/2013
11:21 AM
50%
50%

Can't Fix What You Hide

Willful ignorance may be bliss, but rarely is it compliant

The CEO I was talking with didn't understand his own company's compliance requirements. And he didn't want to understand them. He had delegated this, as many in business do, to his IT director. "Technology will fix this problem" is a common approach.

The company's IT director had actually made a good-faith effort to understand the compliance regulations. He had implemented a number of changes to his team's processes and procedures: new password rules, more detailed logging, database security changes, and so forth.

There are actually major problems with this all-too-common approach:

1. Much of compliance and security cannot be addressed through technology alone. Technology is a tool used by people. No matter how great the technology, the "people factor" cannot be ignored.

2. Hiding behind technology, or blaming it, is socially acceptable, unfortunately. Too many business leaders, technology leaders included, shrug off their role in compliance and security with a, "Well, we just need to update our computers," or, "Our servers need more security." This attitude is more than simplistic; it's inaccurate and potentially dangerous.

3. The IT team may be assigned compliance responsibility, but not adequately trained or enabled to deal with many of the regulations. To make this worse, businesses rarely spend the money to educate the IT team on these issues or to bring in an expert to help.

4. IT rarely has the authority to change either business processes or employee behavior. Assigning new passwords and securing databases will not make a system secure if employees have bad habits that leave important information open and available.

5. Many business leaders give only lip service to making priorities of security and compliance. They fail to understand these business functions are not options or add-ons, but, in reality, are outcomes of the business processes they oversee.

Everyone I talked with at the company in question told me security was important. Some even said they were certain their company was compliant with its industry's regulations.

The truth is, the company's leaders were actively deceiving themselves. Compliance is a headache no one wanted to take the time to deal with, and it was easier to assume someone else had already addressed the issue.

The assumption that company data is secure, even without testing or assessments, is common. Assuming compliance is accomplished with a simple IT checklist is common as well, and commonly encourages small risks to grow into enormous ones. The shock when data is lost or a compliance audit fails -- that's common, too.

Ignorance is bliss, but where compliance and data security are involved, it is also an invisible, but completely avoidable, danger to the health of your business.

Glenn S. Phillips does not want you to suffer from avoidable danger. He is the president of Forte' Incorporated where he works with business leaders who want to leverage technology and understand the often hidden risks awaiting them. Glenn is the author of the book Nerd-to-English and you can find him on twitter at @NerdToEnglish. Glenn works with business leaders who want to leverage technology and understand the often hidden risks awaiting them. The Founder and Sr. Consultant of Forte' Incorporated, Glenn and his team work with business leaders to support growth, increase profits, and address ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6499
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-21
Teradata Viewpoint before 14.0 and 16.20.00.02-b80 contains a hardcoded password of TDv1i2e3w4 for the viewpoint database account (in viewpoint-portal\conf\server.xml) that could potentially be exploited by malicious users to compromise the affected system.
CVE-2019-6500
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-21
In Axway File Transfer Direct 2.7.1, an unauthenticated Directory Traversal vulnerability can be exploited by issuing a specially crafted HTTP GET request with %2e instead of '.' characters, as demonstrated by an initial /h2hdocumentation//%2e%2e/ substring.
CVE-2019-6498
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-21
GattLib 0.2 has a stack-based buffer over-read in gattlib_connect in dbus/gattlib.c because strncpy is misused.
CVE-2019-6497
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-20
Hotels_Server through 2018-11-05 has SQL Injection via the controller/fetchpwd.php username parameter.
CVE-2018-18908
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-20
The Sky Go Desktop application 1.0.19-1 through 1.0.23-1 for Windows performs several requests over cleartext HTTP. This makes the data submitted in these requests prone to Man in The Middle (MiTM) attacks, whereby an attacker would be able to obtain the data sent in these requests. Some of the requ...