Risk

2/15/2008
06:55 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Botnet Hunters Reveal New Spin on Old Tricks

Damballa researchers share some techniques for getting a better picture of botnets - and targeted attacks

Is that malware found on your client machine the sign of a targeted attack or a routine bot-herding run? How do you know for sure?

Botnet hunters from Damballa are using some traditional network monitoring techniques to determine the size and scope of botnets -- information that can even help distinguish between a direct attack or a random bot recruitment.

“We are working on ways to better [calculate] the numbers of these botnets with some accuracy,” says Christopher Davis, director of threat analysis for Damballa. Davis and Damballa chief scientist and co-founder David Dagon will discuss their company’s botnet research techniques at Black Hat D.C. next week.

Damballa researchers basically reverse-engineer the malware code that arrives at one of their customer’s client machines, and then study how it communicates with its command and control (C&C) server. Then, using a DNS cache-inspection technique, combined with tracking the C&C server’s IP packet identifier in TCP/IP, they can take more accurate counts of the number of bots, C&C servers, and the potential scope of a particular botnet.

Damballa is basically putting a new spin on some existing techniques. Phishers, for example, have been known to use DNS cache inspection for reconnaissance before staging an exploit on an organization. “Although these techniques have been around and known for a long time, we’ve never heard of anyone applying them to botnet research,” Davis says.

These methods are useful for bot malware that provides only limited visibility into the botnet’s inner workings, such as HTTP-based botnets. An IRC-based botnet -- or even Storm, which uses peer-to-peer communications -- wouldn’t require these techniques because they are more transparent and simpler to track, Davis says.

Learning about the size of the botnet behind a piece of malware can provide some clues as to whether it’s a targeted attack or a bot-recruiting run. “You’re never able to say 100 percent that this wasn’t a targeted attack. But generally, the bad guy isn’t likely to have a [targeted] enterprise join a 20,000-member botnet. It’s going to be a small one,” Davis says.

With DNS cache inspection, the researchers query regional servers for the “bad” domain. “We can then see if this bad domain has been requested there…it wouldn’t be in the cache if no one else had asked for it,” Davis says.

So if an Atlanta-based ISP’s DNS server retains the bad guy’s domain in its cache, it’s likely that users in that area are getting infected, he says. This gets them closer to learning about the range of the bot population.

Then comes the so-called IPID technique. Davis says the researchers can determine how many packets it takes for the malware’s update or download, so they can use that count to calculate roughly how many bots there are. IPID basically provides a packet counter they can refer to in each query to the C&C server. “Watching IPID, we can tell when [the C&C server] sends a command or someone downloads the malware from it,” Davis says.

The downside of these methods, however, is that they’re relatively “noisy,” Davis says, which could potentially blow the researchers’ cover and prompt the bad guys to relocate their servers. So the researchers try to keep a low profile when scanning DNS servers and when sending packets to the botnet C&C servers so their presence isn’t detected, he says. The goal is to be able to better determine growth, spread, and shifts in a botnet.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Damballa Inc.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Well, at least it isn't Mobby Dick!
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4035
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
IBM Content Navigator 3.0CD could allow attackers to direct web traffic to a malicious site. If attackers make a fake IBM Content Navigator site, they can send a link to ICN users to send request to their Edit client directly. Then Edit client will download documents from the fake ICN website. IBM X...
CVE-2019-4052
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
IBM API Connect 2018.1 and 2018.4.1.2 apis can be leveraged by unauthenticated users to discover login ids of registered users. IBM X-Force ID: 156544.
CVE-2019-9648
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
An issue was discovered in the SFTP Server component in Core FTP 2.0 Build 674. A directory traversal vulnerability exists using the SIZE command along with a \..\..\ substring, allowing an attacker to enumerate file existence based on the returned information.
CVE-2019-9923
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
pax_decode_header in sparse.c in GNU Tar before 1.32 had a NULL pointer dereference when parsing certain archives that have malformed extended headers.
CVE-2019-9924
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
rbash in Bash before 4.4-beta2 did not prevent the shell user from modifying BASH_CMDS, thus allowing the user to execute any command with the permissions of the shell.