Risk
5/14/2013
01:05 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

AirTight Networks' Patent Upheld Over Aerohive Networks' Re-Exam Challenge

USPTO examiner determined that Aerohive did not raise a substantial new question of patentability

Mountain View, CA -- May 14, 2013 -- AirTight Networks announces that the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") denied Aerohive Networks' request to re-examine AirTight's Marker Packet&trade patent (U.S. Patent No. 7,339,914). The USPTO examiner determined that Aerohive did not raise a substantial new question of patentability, thus reaffirming the validity of the AirTight patent over Aerohive's contention.

Aerohive filed its re-examination request to delay AirTight Networks' patent infringement suit against Aerohive, which AirTight filed only after AirTight's sincere efforts to settle this matter amicably failed. After AirTight filed the patent infringement suit to address Aerohive's past and ongoing infringement, Aerohive filed a request with the USPTO to re-examine AirTight's patent on February 15, 2013 (Application No. 90/012,797.) In the decision issued on May 9, 2013, the USPTO summarily rejected Aerohive's contentions and upheld AirTight's patent in its entirety. (Decision dated 05/09/2013 in re: application No. 90/012,797)

Patent re-examination is typically the step that an accused infringer attempts in order to see if the patent can be invalidated and to escape liabilities for infringement. AirTight is confident that any such attempts, now or in future, will be proven futile and eventually Aerohive will be required to compensate AirTight for damages to its business suffered as a result of this patent infringement.

AirTight continues to pursue a leadership strategy in the intellectual property and patent arena and invests enormous resources in R&D to invent and build its unique products. AirTight's innovations are implemented in AirTight Wi-Fi Access and Wireless Intrusion Prevention products for the benefit of its customers. Patents are AirTight's way of ensuring that the technologies that AirTight develops are not copied by others and sold to their customers.

In 2009, Aerohive and AirTight entered into a partnership agreement that was intended to give Aerohive's customers access to AirTight's patented and highly acclaimed wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). However, AirTight alleges that Aerohive instead mis-appropriated AirTight's patented technology and incorporated it into its own products, including Hive AP's.

About AirTight Networks

AirTight Networks is a global provider of secure Wi-Fi solutions that combine its patented and industry-leading wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS) technology with the next generation cloud-managed, controller-less Wi-Fi architecture. This unified approach allows enterprises for the first time to benefit from Wi-Fi access while concurrently protecting their networks 24/7 from wireless threats at no additional cost. AirTight's customers include global enterprises across virtually all industries and range from those who overlay AirTight WIPS&trade on top of other WLAN solutions, to those who leverage the AirTight Cloud Services&trade to rollout and manage AirTight Wi-Fi&trade, WIPS, and regulatory compliance (e.g., PCI) across tens of thousands of locations from a single console. AirTight owns the seminal patents for wireless intrusion prevention technology with 29 U.S. and international patents granted, and more than 20 additional patents pending. For more information, please visit: www.airtightnetworks.com. Follow on Twitter @Airtight.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-9710
Published: 2015-05-27
The Btrfs implementation in the Linux kernel before 3.19 does not ensure that the visible xattr state is consistent with a requested replacement, which allows local users to bypass intended ACL settings and gain privileges via standard filesystem operations (1) during an xattr-replacement time windo...

CVE-2014-9715
Published: 2015-05-27
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.h in the netfilter subsystem in the Linux kernel before 3.14.5 uses an insufficiently large data type for certain extension data, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and OOPS) via outbound network traffic that trig...

CVE-2015-1157
Published: 2015-05-27
CoreText in Apple iOS 8.x through 8.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reboot and messaging disruption) via crafted Unicode text that is not properly handled during display truncation in the Notifications feature, as demonstrated by Arabic characters in (1) an SMS message or (2)...

CVE-2015-2666
Published: 2015-05-27
Stack-based buffer overflow in the get_matching_model_microcode function in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c in the Linux kernel before 4.0 allows context-dependent attackers to gain privileges by constructing a crafted microcode header and leveraging root privileges for write access to t...

CVE-2015-2830
Published: 2015-05-27
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S in the Linux kernel before 3.19.2 does not prevent the TS_COMPAT flag from reaching a user-mode task, which might allow local users to bypass the seccomp or audit protection mechanism via a crafted application that uses the (1) fork or (2) close system call, as demonstrate...

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
After a serious cybersecurity incident, everyone will be looking to you for answers -- but you’ll never have complete information and you’ll never have enough time. So in those heated moments, when a business is on the brink of collapse, how will you and the rest of the board room executives respond?