Perimeter
1/18/2012
05:45 PM
Robert Graham
Robert Graham
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

A Firsthand Piracy Experience

Limited government support of intellectual property helps, but not the strong protections in SOPA/PIPA

Much has been written about SOPA/PIPA today, but I thought I’d give a personal perspective.

Thirteen years ago, I created the “BlackICE” products: “BlackICE Guard” was the first network IPS and “BlackICE Defender” was (one of) the first personal firewalls. My ability to sell these products depended on the government’s protection of intellectual property. I experienced exactly the problems targeted by those laws.

For example, foreign sites would crack the license key and sell pirated copies of the personal firewall, whose users would then come to us for software updates and support. This is the reason for Microsoft’s “Geniune Advantage” program targeting "victims of software piracy." It doesn’t target the casual user who pirates his own copy of Windows and puts it on multiple machines. Instead, it’s copying the foreign resellers of pirated CDs selling them on the streets of Shanghai.

However, while piracy was a problem, it was also an opportunity for BlackICE. Our target market was corporations, not home users.

Corporations might pirate software in order to try it out, but eventually they have to pay for it. In one memorable incident, the CSO of a Fortune 500 company admitted to pirating a few copies of our personal firewall to test it out in his lab -- as he signed the check for 10,000 legitimate copies for the company. Indeed, most security professionals in our industry who got their start in the late 1990s pirated my software at one point or another.

So why not simply make a free trial version available, or a shareware version? Mostly, it was perception. When you give something away for free, customers expect it to be free. It’s hard convincing customers to pay for something if you are already giving it away on the Internet. Conversely, when your software becomes the most pirated software on the Internet (as BlackICE was for a time), it creates a perception of value.

The moral of this story is that, yes, we need limited government support of intellectual property. Without such support, we could never have sold any product and never would have developed it. But on the other hand, we neither needed nor wanted the strong protections in the SOPA/PIPA bills. We didn't want these laws then, and since so much cybersecurity content is created by collaboration, such laws will be damaging to our future.

Robert Graham is CEO of Errata Security.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mya
50%
50%
Mya,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/19/2012 | 5:34:17 AM
re: A Firsthand Piracy Experience
Sharing about your experience in the industry and your opinion about the government for intellectual property was interesting
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-0334
Published: 2014-10-31
Bundler before 1.7, when multiple top-level source lines are used, allows remote attackers to install arbitrary gems by creating a gem with the same name as another gem in a different source.

CVE-2014-2334
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web User Interface in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.7 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2336.

CVE-2014-2335
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web User Interface in Fortinet FortiManager before 5.0.7 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2336.

CVE-2014-2336
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web User Interface in Fortinet FortiManager before 5.0.7 and FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.7 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2334 and CVE-2014-2335.

CVE-2014-3366
Published: 2014-10-31
SQL injection vulnerability in the administrative web interface in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted response, aka Bug ID CSCup88089.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.