Risk
3/9/2011
01:53 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Trade Groups Push Cybersecurity Carrots, Not Sticks

Coalition says financial rewards would be more effective than laws in encouraging private-sector companies to upgrade their IT security.

Inside DHS' Classified Cyber-Coordination Headquarters
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Inside DHS' Classified Cyber-Coordination Headquarters

The Obama administration should use financial incentives to encourage private companies to improve cybersecurity and create standards, a coalition of industry groups and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has recommended.

In a paper published this week, the Business Software Alliance, the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Internet Security Alliance, TechAmerica, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce commend the federal government for work that's already been done based on Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review. That document, published in May 2009, made 24 cybersecurity policy recommendations for the federal government to implement.

The group made a host of recommendations to improve the partnership, urged by the review, between the federal government and private companies, one of which is to provide more financial motivation for private-sector companies to upgrade their cybersecurity.

"The... finding that cost and complexity, not lack of ability or commitment, are the largest problems in implementing effective cyber solutions has also been confirmed by multiple independent studies," according to the paper. "This research shows that although many enterprises are investing heavily in cybersecurity, many others, largely due to the economic downturn, are reducing their cybersecurity investments."

This is why regulation alone won't improve how businesses implement cybsecurity, the coalition said. The administration should use "a menu of market incentives" as well to encourage businesses to create cybersecurity standards.

Any incentives created, however, must strike a balance of being "powerful enough to affect behavior without being so burdensome as to curtail U.S. investment, innovation, and job creation," according to the paper.

The coalition makes recommendations in seven areas of cybersecurity: risk management; information management; information sharing and privacy; international engagement; supply chain security; innovation and research and development; and education and awareness.

Incentives are recommended as part of its risk-management recommendations, which also include the use and further development of international standards to promote cybersecurity and to recognize the different roles and responsibilities industries play in risk management.

The coalition is not the only entity to be critical of the administration's Cyberspace Policy Review. A report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released in October found that while the feds are making progress in implementing the cybersecurity policy recommendations made by the review, they must better define agency roles and responsibilities and establish firmer implementation schedules.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-6335
Published: 2014-08-26
The Backup-Archive client in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) for Space Management 5.x and 6.x before 6.2.5.3, 6.3.x before 6.3.2, 6.4.x before 6.4.2, and 7.1.x before 7.1.0.3 on Linux and AIX, and 5.x and 6.x before 6.1.5.6 on Solaris and HP-UX, does not preserve file permissions across backup and ...

CVE-2014-0480
Published: 2014-08-26
The core.urlresolvers.reverse function in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 does not properly validate URLs, which allows remote attackers to conduct phishing attacks via a // (slash slash) in a URL, which triggers a scheme-relative URL ...

CVE-2014-0481
Published: 2014-08-26
The default configuration for the file upload handling system in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 uses a sequential file name generation process when a file with a conflicting name is uploaded, which allows remote attackers to cause a d...

CVE-2014-0482
Published: 2014-08-26
The contrib.auth.middleware.RemoteUserMiddleware middleware in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3, when using the contrib.auth.backends.RemoteUserBackend backend, allows remote authenticated users to hijack web sessions via vectors relate...

CVE-2014-0483
Published: 2014-08-26
The administrative interface (contrib.admin) in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 does not check if a field represents a relationship between models, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a to_field ...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
This episode of Dark Reading Radio looks at infosec security from the big enterprise POV with interviews featuring Ron Plesco, Cyber Investigations, Intelligence & Analytics at KPMG; and Chris Inglis & Chris Bell of Securonix.