Risk
10/29/2013
04:20 PM
James Bindseil
James Bindseil
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again

More than one third of all data security breaches at government agencies are caused accidentally by internal employees.

Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
(click image for larger view)
Hacker groups such as LulzSec and Anonymous likely come to mind when discussing data breaches in the public sector. Both groups, along with other rogue hackers, have proven themselves more than capable of bypassing government security measures and gaining access to confidential data. But, surprisingly, they are not IT's biggest threat.

According to research by the Ponemon Institute, the actions of agency employees can be even riskier. More than one third of all data breaches are internal and unintentionally caused by employees, and federal agencies are not exempt. In fact, the public sector is one of the most targeted industries, second only to financial services.

"While external attackers and their evolving methods pose a great threat to companies, the dangers associated with the insider threat can be equally destructive and insidious," said Larry Ponemon, chairman of the research firm, in a recent interview. "Eight years of research on data breach costs has shown employee behavior to be one of the most pressing issues facing organizations today, up 22% since the first survey."

According to Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, government agencies have seen a steady increase in employee-caused data breaches over the last four years. Employee negligence has caused over 150 breaches since January 2009, resulting in the loss of more than 92.5 million data records.

[ Find out why malicious insider threats are getting harder to stop. Read Insider Threats Get More Difficult To Detect. ]

Unfortunately, public CIOs can't simply "plug the leak," but they can place a greater emphasis on the underlying cause of many data breaches: using insecure, un-managed methods to transfer sensitive data, such as:

-- Easily lost or stolen removable storage, particularly those housing unencrypted data (USBs, hard drives, disks, etc.)

-- Emails containing sensitive data sent to the wrong party

-- Third-party file-sharing and storage websites (Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.)

As occurrences increase in size and frequency, the cost per record lost is also rising. The Ponemon study reveals that the U.S. has one of the highest average costs per record ($136). The study also shows that third-party errors and lost or stolen devices have the most effect on the cost of a data breach.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Chuck Brooks
50%
50%
Chuck Brooks,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/8/2013 | 9:31:03 PM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
James is on point, cybersecurity risks are often teh result of internal breaches. The best way to address this is to have Informed risk management for employees on security protocols and processes to provide basic security awareness/identify threats.

-+
-+
pcalento011
50%
50%
pcalento011,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/31/2013 | 3:28:51 AM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
While certainly a "culture of security" can help address the threat, poorly architected systems also pose a risk. I'm not saying cloud computing or Big Data or any other technology is to blame, but a lack of planning leads to a lack of security. Blaming employees is too easy.
Ulf Mattsson
50%
50%
Ulf Mattsson,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/30/2013 | 9:31:33 PM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
I agree that "Secure and manage data in motion" and "Tightening the security perimeter will always be a top priority for federal IT professionals", but I think that the perimeter is gone and that the most attractive target is data in large databases.

I think that the flow of sensitive data across different systems and databases should be protected. I recently read an interesting study from Aberdeen Group about security-related incidents. The study revealed that GǣOver the last 12 months, tokenization users had 50% fewer security-related incidents(e.g., unauthorized access, data loss or data exposure than tokenization non-usersGǥ. The name of the study is GǣTokenization Gets TractionGǥ.

I also think that security teams need to look at if data access patterns are normal for users that are accessing sensitive data. Tools can help to determine if the pattern is normal, is this what the typical employee does as part of their work, or is this behavior out of the ordinary.

Ulf Mattsson, CTO Protegrity
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/30/2013 | 6:38:01 PM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
This article has a government spin, but it's also very applicable to the private sector. Pay close heed to the practical advice on page two on curbing unintended data breaches unwittingly instigated by internal employees.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the security connected approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3366
Published: 2014-10-31
SQL injection vulnerability in the administrative web interface in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted response, aka Bug ID CSCup88089.

CVE-2014-3372
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the CCM reports interface in the Server in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuq90589.

CVE-2014-3373
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the CCM Dialed Number Analyzer interface in the Server in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCup92550.

CVE-2014-3374
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the CCM admin interface in the Server in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuq90582.

CVE-2014-3375
Published: 2014-10-31
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the CCM Service interface in the Server in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuq90597.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.