Risk
8/27/2008
03:53 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Spammers Use 'Hijacked' Babies To Lure Victims

The social engineering campaign includes an attached file, purportedly a photo of the recipient's child, but which is, of course, malware.

As part of their ongoing experiments to see which outlandish claims can dupe e-mail recipients into opening malicious messages, spammers have apparently taken to ransoming babies.

As noted by researchers at message security company Sophos, spammers have launched a social engineering campaign in which the sender claims to have "hijacked" the recipient's baby.

"We have hijacked your baby but you must pay once to us $50,000," the ransom message says, with a sentence structure that suggests further study of English grammar might be warranted. "The details we will send later..."

The attached file, purportedly a photo of the recipient's child, is, of course, malware. Sophos identifies it as Troj/Resex-Fam.

"There's no other way of putting it -- this attack is sick," wrote Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant for Sophos, in an online post. "Hackers have no qualms about exploiting a family's natural instinct to defend its most vulnerable members. Hopefully people will pause before opening the attachment, but the reflex action of some may be to click first and think later."

This is not the first time online scammers have resorted to such tactics. In February, the FBI reiterated previous warnings about a long-standing spam campaign that threatens the recipient with death if payment isn't made. The threat, said the FBI, is a hoax.

That's not to say extortion and kidnapping aren't real problems. In many parts of the world, like Mexico, such crimes regularly make the headlines. But people making general threats via e-mail, without any reference to the recipient's identity or circumstances, are probably more interested in stealing personal information than infants.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Why else would HR ask me if I have a handicap?"
Current Issue
The Changing Face of Identity Management
Mobility and cloud services are altering the concept of user identity. Here are some ways to keep up.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.