Risk
3/2/2012
12:13 PM
50%
50%

Should NSA Be Scanning Business Networks?

After NSA presses for such a role, DHS argues it's better suited. But security experts at RSA conference say there's an alternate approach to strengthening company networks.

To what extent should government agencies become involved in directly helping businesses--including companies providing critical infrastructure services--improve their information security operations?

The Washington Post this week reported that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been pressing the Obama administration to allow it to scan the networks of hundreds of large U.S. businesses.

But the White House has resisted the proposal, in large part over the privacy concerns related to requiring American businesses--including defense contractors--to submit to the NSA scanning their network. Meanwhile, officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have said that while the NSA should have a role, really it's DHS who should be leading the cybersecurity charge.

"Right now there's all this backbiting going on in the press between NSA, on the one hand, and DHS on the other," said Richard Clarke, who served as the counterterrorism czar in the Clinton and Bush administrations, and who's now chairman of Good Harbor Consulting, in a meeting at this week's RSA conference in San Francisco. "That really shows an enormous amount of lack of discipline in the executive branch. The White House and the Pentagon ought to silence that sort of thing. It's all one government. No matter who has the lead, you can count on the other elements to support."

[ See our complete RSA 2012 Security Conference coverage, live from San Francisco. ]

"I side with the administration about this," said Jason Healy, director of the Cyber Statecraft Initiative at think tank the Atlantic Council, speaking on a panel at RSA. "If we really cared about the private sector, we'd be bending over backwards to make sure they have everything they need, and if they should have what NSA has, then [the agency] should be doing a better job to declassify." Any difficulty in sharing what are essentially threat signatures, he said, simply represented "a failure of imagination."

The suggestion of greater NSA involvement in the networks of businesses has triggered debate about the extent to which an intelligence service should become involved in the day-to-day running of businesses' security operations. For many people, furthermore, the NSA's reputation remains tarnished by its warrantless wiretapping program, if not still the Clipper chip debacle.

"They have a deficit of public trust, and there are some people who--rightly or wrongly--are never going to trust them to be the happy, smiley face," said Clarke. Accordingly, his suggestion is simple: "Have DHS be the connection to the private sector, and to the extent that DHS doesn't have skills that NSA does have, then NSA can provide them to DHS," he said.

Likewise, many privacy experts have called on the NSA to share what it knows, then let businesses use that information to better secure their networks, thus mixing the best of both worlds, while avoiding privacy concerns. "The best capabilities of the private sector network operators [are] that they know their own systems better than the government ever could and are able to act most quickly to stop threats before they can propagate," said Jim Dempsey, VP for public policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology, in a blog post. "The best capabilities of the military are the classified insights gleaned from intelligence sources and methods."

Already, the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Pilot has begun trialing the sharing of NSA intelligence information--in the form of attack signatures--with defense contractors and Internet service providers, to help them better secure their networks. But participants' initial reaction to the DIB pilot has apparently been, "So what?"

"They didn't provide the defense companies anything they didn't already know," said Clarke, noting that of the 25 threat profiles shared by the NSA, most of the companies already knew about 24 of them. "If the government wants to have companies engaged in that kind of a program, then the government is going to have to open the kimono a little more," he said. "I find it hard to believe that NSA didn't have more that it could have offered. ... It's a lot of hassle to get one profile."

As federal agencies embrace devices and apps to meet employee demand, the White House seeks one comprehensive mobile strategy. Also in the new Going Mobile issue of InformationWeek Government: Find out how the National Security Agency is developing technologies to make commercial devices suitable for intelligence work. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
KLC
50%
50%
KLC,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/5/2012 | 6:10:53 PM
re: Should NSA Be Scanning Business Networks?
Personally, I have nothing to hide from ANY agency. They can watch and listen to me for whatever they want. However, we could make it a lot more comfortable for people with privacy and "rights" issues, by passing very stringent laws about what such monitoring can be used for. Explicitly state that such monitoring can only be used to fight cybersecurity and/or terrorist threats to the security of the country. Plus, any violation should result in substantial jail time and financial punishments. Lastly (and only loosely related), punishments for being convicted of cyber crime should be increased exponentially (e.g., hacking should get a minimum of 10 years, ID Theft should get a minimum of 20 years).
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
3/4/2012 | 4:26:14 AM
re: Should NSA Be Scanning Business Networks?
@ readers: From a privacy standpoint, is this a slippery slope? Should this only be done if businesses request it, or should the NSA be allowed to do it as it sees fit?
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
dbtinc
50%
50%
dbtinc,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/2/2012 | 8:39:35 PM
re: Should NSA Be Scanning Business Networks?
Successful countries do just that - business and government cooperate where they can.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-6501
Published: 2015-03-30
The default soap.wsdl_cache_dir setting in (1) php.ini-production and (2) php.ini-development in PHP through 5.6.7 specifies the /tmp directory, which makes it easier for local users to conduct WSDL injection attacks by creating a file under /tmp with a predictable filename that is used by the get_s...

CVE-2014-9209
Published: 2015-03-30
Untrusted search path vulnerability in the Clean Utility application in Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Services Platform before 2.71.00 and FactoryTalk View Studio 8.00.00 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in an unspecified directory.

CVE-2014-9652
Published: 2015-03-30
The mconvert function in softmagic.c in file before 5.21, as used in the Fileinfo component in PHP before 5.4.37, 5.5.x before 5.5.21, and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, does not properly handle a certain string-length field during a copy of a truncated version of a Pascal string, which might allow remote atta...

CVE-2014-9653
Published: 2015-03-30
readelf.c in file before 5.22, as used in the Fileinfo component in PHP before 5.4.37, 5.5.x before 5.5.21, and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, does not consider that pread calls sometimes read only a subset of the available data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uninitialized memory ...

CVE-2014-9705
Published: 2015-03-30
Heap-based buffer overflow in the enchant_broker_request_dict function in ext/enchant/enchant.c in PHP before 5.4.38, 5.5.x before 5.5.22, and 5.6.x before 5.6.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that trigger creation of multiple dictionaries.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Good hackers--aka security researchers--are worried about the possible legal and professional ramifications of President Obama's new proposed crackdown on cyber criminals.