Risk
1/27/2011
12:25 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Russia To NATO: Investigate Stuxnet

The Stuxnet worm is alleged to have set back Iranian's controversial uranium enrichment program significantly. Now, the Russians are asking NATO to find some answers.

The Stuxnet worm is alleged to have set back Iranian's controversial uranium enrichment program significantly. Now, the Russians are asking NATO to find some answers.A number of news reports have quoted Dmitry Rogozin, Russian envoy to NATO, as asking NATO to investigate the Stuxnet incident.

Last week the New York Times ran this story speculating that the worm is (shockingly) a joint US-Israeli operation, that it had mixed success in hitting its targets, and that it is an ongoing attack:

The worm itself now appears to have included two major components. One was designed to send Iran's nuclear centrifuges spinning wildly out of control. Another seems right out of the movies: The computer program also secretly recorded what normal operations at the nuclear plant looked like, then played those readings back to plant operators, like a pre-recorded security tape in a bank heist, so that it would appear that everything was operating normally while the centrifuges were actually tearing themselves apart.

The attacks were not fully successful: Some parts of Iran's operations ground to a halt, while others survived, according to the reports of international nuclear inspectors. Nor is it clear the attacks are over: Some experts who have examined the code believe it contains the seeds for yet more versions and assaults.

It's not clear, if in this Reuters' story, Rogozin is parroting what was read in the New York Times' story, or if he is confirming it with independent knowledge:

"The operators saw on their screens that the centrifuges were working normally when in fact they were out of control," Rogozin told reporters.

"NATO should get down to investigating this matter," he said. He said the worm could have sparked an event similar to the "Chernobyl tragedy," which blighted Ukraine in 1986.

"This virus, which is very toxic, very dangerous, could have very serious implications," he said, according to agency reports.

Good luck on getting the NATO investigation. And good luck figuring out – to any degree of certainty – who wrote Stuxnet.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, find me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2010-5110
Published: 2014-08-29
DCTStream.cc in Poppler before 0.13.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted PDF file.

CVE-2012-1503
Published: 2014-08-29
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Six Apart (formerly Six Apart KK) Movable Type (MT) Pro 5.13 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the comment section.

CVE-2013-5467
Published: 2014-08-29
Monitoring Agent for UNIX Logs 6.2.0 through FP03, 6.2.1 through FP04, 6.2.2 through FP09, and 6.2.3 through FP04 and Monitoring Server (ms) and Shared Libraries (ax) 6.2.0 through FP03, 6.2.1 through FP04, 6.2.2 through FP08, 6.2.3 through FP01, and 6.3.0 through FP01 in IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM)...

CVE-2014-0600
Published: 2014-08-29
FileUploadServlet in the Administration service in Novell GroupWise 2014 before SP1 allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files via the poLibMaintenanceFileSave parameter, aka ZDI-CAN-2287.

CVE-2014-0888
Published: 2014-08-29
IBM Worklight Foundation 5.x and 6.x before 6.2.0.0, as used in Worklight and Mobile Foundation, allows remote authenticated users to bypass the application-authenticity feature via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
This episode of Dark Reading Radio looks at infosec security from the big enterprise POV with interviews featuring Ron Plesco, Cyber Investigations, Intelligence & Analytics at KPMG; and Chris Inglis & Chris Bell of Securonix.