Risk
7/30/2010
12:03 AM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Rite Aid's $1 Million Settlement: More Good Enforcement News

Rite Aid Corp. having to pay a $1 million settlement to possible Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violations is another right step in the direction of enforcement.

Rite Aid Corp. having to pay a $1 million settlement to possible Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violations is another right step in the direction of enforcement.It's also another glaring example of the lackadaisical attitude businesses and the medical community have toward securing patient medical records. Rite Aid Corp agreed to pay the $1 million to resolve Department of Health and Human Services allegations that the company didn't take the proper steps to protect the health data customers provided.

The investigation into Rite Aid started after a news organization, WTHR, essentially traveled to number of cities to dumpster dive (an old and wildly successful hacking tactic) into the trashcans of pharmacies. The reporters found pharmacy labels, job applications, and other sensitive data. Soon the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the FTC were investigating potential HIPAA violations:

OCR, which enforces the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules, opened its investigation of Rite Aid after television media videotaped incidents in which pharmacies were shown to have disposed of prescriptions and labeled pill bottles containing individuals' identifiable information in industrial trash containers that were accessible to the public. These incidents were reported as occurring in a variety of cities across the United States. Rite Aid pharmacy stores in several of the cities were highlighted in media reports.

Disposing of individuals' health information in an industrial trash container accessible to unauthorized persons is not compliant with several requirements of the HIPAA Privacy Rule and exposes the individuals' information to the risk of identity theft and other crimes. This is the second joint investigation and settlement conducted by OCR and FTC. OCR and FTC settled a similar case involving another national drug store chain in February 2009.

The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires health plans, health care clearinghouses and most health care providers (covered entities), including most pharmacies, to safeguard the privacy of patient information, including such information during its disposal.

It sure does. And it's surely too often ignored as we covered similar incidents in recent posts Patient Data Dump Nets Urgent Care Center $50,000 Fine and Medical Records Keep Getting Dumped.

The investigation found that:

Rite Aid failed to implement adequate policies and procedures to appropriately safeguard patient information during the disposal process;

Rite Aid failed to adequately train employees on how to dispose of such information properly; and Rite Aid did not maintain a sanctions policy for members of its workforce who failed to properly dispose of patient information.

In addition to the $1 million resolution payment, Rite Aid must implement the following corrective actions:

Revising and distributing its policies and procedures regarding disposal of protected health information and sanctioning workers who do not follow them;

Training workforce members on these new requirements;

Conducting internal monitoring; and

Engaging a qualified, independent third-party assessor to conduct compliance reviews and render reports to HHS.

As with most FTC consent orders relating to privacy and security, Rite Aid will have to undergo external independent assessments of its stores' level of compliance to the consent order. And the action is in place for 20 years.

Hopefully (yet, unlikely) this will open the eyes of others who handle medical data to do so properly.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, find me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6090
Published: 2015-04-27
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) DataMappingEditorCommands, (2) DatastoreEditorCommands, and (3) IEGEditorCommands servlets in IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 SP6 before EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.3 before 6.0.3.0 iFix8, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.5 iFix...

CVE-2014-6092
Published: 2015-04-27
IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 before SP6 EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.6, and 6.0.5 before 6.0.5.6 requires failed-login handling for web-service accounts to have the same lockout policy as for standard user accounts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause...

CVE-2015-0113
Published: 2015-04-27
The Jazz help system in IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 4.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Quality Manager 4.0 through 4.0.7 and 5.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Team Concert 4.0 through 4.0.7 and 5.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Requirements Composer 4.0 through 4.0.7, Rational DOORS Next Generation...

CVE-2015-0174
Published: 2015-04-27
The SNMP implementation in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 before 8.5.5.5 does not properly handle configuration data, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-0175
Published: 2015-04-27
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 Liberty Profile before 8.5.5.5 does not properly implement authData elements, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.