10:23 AM
Connect Directly

Pentagon Demands Wikileaks Return Afghanistan Files

Documents were held back to delete names and other sensitive information from the 75,000 files Wikileaks released in July.

The battle between the U.S. government and website Wikileaks intensified last week as the Pentagon demanded the return of 15,000 classified files about the war in Afghanistan the site claims it has acquired.

"These documents are the property of the U.S. government and contain classified and sensitive information," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said in a press conference Thursday, the video of which is available online.

He demanded that "all versions" of them be returned to the U.S. government immediately.

Morrell also refuted published reports that Wikileaks asked the Department of Defense for help in reviewing the files before releasing them to the public. "Wikileaks has made no such request directly to the Department of Defense," he said.

Via its Twitter feed, Wikileaks first responded by calling Morrell "obnoxious" and taking the opportunity to ask for financial support.

Later, though, another post from the site seemed to take the request a bit more seriously. "We are examining the Pentagon's 'request' and will issue a statement in due course," Wikileaks said. So far, however, no formal statement has been issued.

Wikileaks also refuted Morrell's claim that the DoD received no document-review request from the site. "Don't be fooled by Pentagon rhetorical tricks," according to a Twitter post, which said the site requested help through an "agreed intermediary."

Wikileaks has consistently run afoul of authorities and governments worldwide for obtaining often classified documents and publishing them online. Proponents of the site, however, praise it for bolstering freedom of speech and representing an important tool for journalists.

The heat from the U.S. government on Wikileaks intensified two months ago when the DoD arrested a military intelligence analyst for allegedly leaking the video of a 2007 U.S. helicopter attack on people assembled in a Baghdad square. The attack left two Reuters employees dead and two children wounded.

The latest skirmish started on July 25 when Wikileaks released a batch of more than 75,000 files called the Afghan War Diary 2004-2010, regarding the current conflict in Afghanistan. The files depict a war in which an alarming number of civilians have been killed and caused an outcry of criticism from the press and public about U.S. military failures in the region.

The 15,000 documents currently at issue would have been released at the same time but their disclosure was delayed so Wikileaks could remove names and other sensitive information.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Dark Reading, September 16, 2014
Malicious software is morphing to be more targeted, stealthy, and destructive. Are you prepared to stop it?
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
Published: 2014-09-22
Cobham Aviator 700D and 700E satellite terminals use an improper algorithm for PIN codes, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain a privileged terminal session by calculating the superuser code, and then leveraging physical access or terminal access to enter this code.

Published: 2014-09-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6025. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-6025. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6025 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to pre...

Published: 2014-09-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-5524. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-5524. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-5524 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent acciden...

Published: 2014-09-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

Published: 2014-09-22
The Mzone Login (aka com.mr384.MzoneLogin) application 1.2.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio