Risk

7/29/2008
06:40 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Oracle WebLogic Servers Vulnerable To Attacks

When it comes to security vulnerabilities, this flaw is as ugly as it gets -- but, in this case, it's not all because of anything Oracle did wrong.

When it comes to security vulnerabilities, this flaw is as ugly as it gets -- but, in this case, it's not all because of anything Oracle did wrong.Thanks to the fact that a remotely exploitable vulnerability was disclosed on a mailing list just after Oracle's July 15 patch cycle, users of WebLogic Server and WebLogic Express are at an extraordinary level of risk to attack right now. The flaw in question, which Oracle has published this security bulletin about, enables an attacker to remotely compromise at-risk systems without any authentication. Nasty.

In this case, the security researcher that discovered the flaw chose to announce their find, along with accompanying attack code, without ever giving the database maker a chance to remedy the problem.

Here's what Eric Maurice had to say on Oracle's Global Product Security Blog:

Unfortunately, the person(s) who published this vulnerability and associated exploit codes didn't contact Oracle before publicly disclosing this issue. This means that the vulnerability was made public before providing Oracle an opportunity to develop an appropriate fix for this issue and notify its customers. In addition, the vulnerability was made public shortly after the publication of the July 15 Critical Patch Update, therefore prompting Oracle to issue an out of cycle security update.

So there you have it. Someone decided to not only dump a highly critical, remotely exploitable vulnerability on the world (and the software necessary to exploit the flaw), it also seems as if (I've no way of knowing for sure) that they cherry-picked the timing to fall right after Oracle's scheduled patch release.

That's just reckless.

Oracle has published work-around instructions here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
'Hidden Tunnels' Help Hackers Launch Financial Services Attacks
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/20/2018
Inside a SamSam Ransomware Attack
Ajit Sancheti, CEO and Co-Founder, Preempt,  6/20/2018
Tesla Employee Steals, Sabotages Company Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  6/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-12716
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-25
The API service on Google Home and Chromecast devices before mid-July 2018 does not prevent DNS rebinding attacks from reading the scan_results JSON data, which allows remote attackers to determine the physical location of most web browsers by leveraging the presence of one of these devices on its l...
CVE-2018-12705
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
DIGISOL DG-BR4000NG devices have XSS via the SSID (it is validated only on the client side).
CVE-2018-12706
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
DIGISOL DG-BR4000NG devices have a Buffer Overflow via a long Authorization HTTP header.
CVE-2018-12714
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 4.17.2. The filter parsing in kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c could be called with no filter, which is an N=0 case when it expected at least one line to have been read, thus making the N-1 index invalid. This allows attackers to cause a denial o...
CVE-2018-12713
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-24
GIMP through 2.10.2 makes g_get_tmp_dir calls to establish temporary filenames, which may result in a filename that already exists, as demonstrated by the gimp_write_and_read_file function in app/tests/test-xcf.c. This might be leveraged by attackers to overwrite files or read file content that was ...