Risk
8/3/2010
11:20 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

On iPhone, Jailbreaking, And Security

It may not be the fashionable decision, but I choose not to jailbreak my iPhone. That's primarily out of security concerns. However, it turns out that Jailbreaking (read: pwning) an iPhone is now as simple as visiting a web page.

It may not be the fashionable decision, but I choose not to jailbreak my iPhone. That's primarily out of security concerns. However, it turns out that Jailbreaking (read: pwning) an iPhone is now as simple as visiting a web page.That's right. The Dev-Team, the group that made it relatively easy to jailbreak previous versions of the iPhone have done it again. This time, however, iPhone users need only visit a website, www.jailbreakme.com, from their mobile device to have the jailbreak completed.

According to this security advisory there are two vulnerabilities that affect Apple iOS for iPhone, iPad, and iPod that are making this possible:

The first issue is caused by a memory corruption error when processing Compact Font Format (CFF) data within a PDF document, which could be exploited by attackers to execute arbitrary code by tricking a user into visiting a specially crafted web page using Mobile Safari.

The second vulnerability is caused by an error in the kernel, which could allow attackers to gain elevated privileges and bypass sandbox restrictions.

Note: These flaws are currently being exploited by jailbreakme to remotely jailbreak Apple devices.

This makes the www.jailbreakme.com Web site work much the same way a drive-by Web exploit works, but only with permission of the user. So maybe we dub this service a "drive-through" exploit :-)

Now, thanks to a recent decision by the Copyright Office and Librarian of Congress regarding the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) - jailbreaking one's iPhone is now legal. Though could result in losing your Apple warranty. While I welcome this DMCA decision, as we should be able to tinker with our gadgets, I do think this jailbreak method raises a security concern.

This is encouraging users to visit a web site to actually have their device hacked. I've no reason to believe that anything more is going on at jailbreakme.com than the rooting of the iOS devices - but exploiting these vulnerabilities does enable remote users to gain control of the device. So it's quite easy to see how malicious attackers could socially engineer users to "jailbreak" their device and also insert a keystroke logger, traffic sniffer, of bot onto the iPhone, iPod, or iPad.

Just as it's not a great idea for credit card companies and banks to e-mail users links back to their sites within e-mails, as it makes it easier for phishers to lure customers to malicious sites: it's not a good idea to have people going to web sites to have their phones jailbroken.

Speaking of malicious attackers: These vulnerabilities make it very easy to hack an iOS powered device by merely opening an Adobe PDF file. So I'd suggest avoiding them completely on the Web until Apple issues a patch.

Apple is currently "looking into" the report of the software vulnerabilities, according to this post by AppleInsider. I'd expect a patch to become available soon.

For my security and technology tweets throughout the day, find me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2010-5312
Published: 2014-11-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jquery.ui.dialog.js in the Dialog widget in jQuery UI before 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title option.

CVE-2012-6662
Published: 2014-11-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the default content option in jquery.ui.tooltip.js in the Tooltip widget in jQuery UI before 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title attribute, which is not properly handled in the autocomplete combo box demo.

CVE-2014-1424
Published: 2014-11-24
apparmor_parser in the apparmor package before 2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1 in Ubuntu 14.04 allows attackers to bypass AppArmor policies via unspecified vectors, related to a "miscompilation flaw."

CVE-2014-7817
Published: 2014-11-24
The wordexp function in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.21 does not enforce the WRDE_NOCMD flag, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands, as demonstrated by input containing "$((`...`))".

CVE-2014-7821
Published: 2014-11-24
OpenStack Neutron before 2014.1.4 and 2014.2.x before 2014.2.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted dns_nameservers value in the DNS configuration.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?