Risk
5/29/2009
12:53 PM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Obama Cybersecurity Plan: What's In It For SMBs?

New cyberczar (though no names yet), management from the top, calls for more coordinated cybersecurity efforts, privacy protection -- same old same old, or does the unveiling of the Obama administration's cybersecurity plan promise real changes in the government's approach to scuring cyberspace. More importantly, what's in the plan for small and midsized businesses?

New cyberczar (though no names yet), management from the top, calls for more coordinated cybersecurity efforts, privacy protection -- same old same old, or does the unveiling of the Obama administration's cybersecurity plan promise real changes in the government's approach to scuring cyberspace. More importantly, what's in the plan for small and midsized businesses?President Obama's outline this morning of cybersecurity initiatives his administration intends to pursue includes a couple of points that, if followed up on, may have positive impacts for small and midsize businesses (and the rest of the country, too).

On the other hand, the report kicks off with one that may give some pause, and not just to businesses:

But with the broad reach of a loose and lightly regulated digital infrastructure, great risks threaten nations, private enterprises, and individual rights. The government has a responsibility to address these strategic vulnerabilities to ensure that the United States and its citizens, together with the larger community of nations, can realize the full potential of the information technology revolution.

The looseness and lightness of regulation, of course, are often touted as the precise reasons why the Internet, has flourished and why more than a few small and midsized businesses flourished along with it. Have to see what sorts of regulations -- taxation? access limitations? -- and how heavy they are before we can know how a)likely they are to be enacted and b) how much they are likely to change the Net As We Know It.

The emphasis on cyber security education as a national priority is important, but the devil here (the angels, too, I guess) will be in the details:

...the Federal government should initiate a national public awareness and education campaign informed by previous successful campaigns.

The report proposes:

To help achieve these goals, the Nation should:

Promote cybersecurity risk awareness for all citizens;

Build an education system that will enhance understanding of cybersecurity and allow the United States to retain and expand upon its scientific, engineering, and market leadership in information technology;

Expand and train the workforce to protect the Nations competitive advantage; and

 Help organizations and individuals make smart choices as they manage risk.

Admirable goals -- but a k-12 program for example, puts a decade and a half between us and the first full-run graduates. The emphasis -- and execution -- of aggressive and comprehensive campaigns of consumer cybersecurity awareness is crucially important, particularly as consumer technologies -- the same ones many of your employees are bringing to the workplace -- present larger and larger potential risks.

One interesting note is a planned (promised may be too strong a word for today's announcements) use of incentives, positive and negative, to encourage heightened cybersecurity practices throughout the economy:

Additional incentive mechanisms that the government should explore include adjustments to liability considerations (reduced liability in exchange for improved security or increased liability for the consequences of poor security), indemnification, tax incentives, and new regulatory requirements and compliance mechanisms.

Shouldn't have to have tax benefits, say, for protecting data and access to data, but we've seen all too often that all too many business, sites, and IPs don't bother with even critical patches; maybe incentives (and on the side, stiff penalties and liabilities) would help. Certainly for companies practicing sound security measures, tax incentives would be a reward as well as an inducement, and nothing wrong with that.

Early days yet, clearly, to know how many, if any of these recommendations will come to fruition -- the cyberczar, for instant, remains an Administrator To Be Named -- and while the world moves at Netspeed the Congress and other regulatory bodies don't.

Stay tuned.

The complete 60 Day Cyberspace Policy Review is here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3409
Published: 2014-10-25
The Ethernet Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) handling feature in Cisco IOS 12.2(33)SRE9a and earlier and IOS XE 3.13S and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed CFM packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq93406.

CVE-2014-4620
Published: 2014-10-25
The EMC NetWorker Module for MEDITECH (aka NMMEDI) 3.0 build 87 through 90, when EMC RecoverPoint and Plink are used, stores cleartext RecoverPoint Appliance credentials in nsrmedisv.raw log files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading these files.

CVE-2014-4623
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar 6.0.x, 6.1.x, and 7.0.x in Avamar Data Store (ADS) GEN4(S) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE), when Password Hardening before 2.0.0.4 is enabled, uses UNIX DES crypt for password hashing, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain cleartext passwords via a brute-force a...

CVE-2014-4624
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar Data Store (ADS) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE) 6.x and 7.0.x through 7.0.2-43 do not require authentication for Java API calls, which allows remote attackers to discover grid MCUser and GSAN passwords via a crafted call.

CVE-2014-6151
Published: 2014-10-25
CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Integrated Portal (TIP) 2.2.x allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.