Compliance is seen mainly as a costly inconvenience in many organizations.
Health Data Security: Tips And Tools
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Sometimes clarity comes out of the blue, including clarity about compliance issues. Recently I was meeting with a friend and business associate, Ben Drake. His company works with networking and data protection technology for a number of businesses.
I mentioned how some organizations with obvious Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance issues seem uninterested in putting forth the effort to resolve them. Some won't even acknowledge they have issues. Ben shrugs and matter-of-factly says, "Nobody cares about HIPAA."
That took a minute to soak in, but I got his point. Knowing Ben, I knew his comment was not literal, it was for effect. But generally speaking, he has a strong point. In the greater scheme of many businesses, HIPAA (and other regulations) are commonly seen by management and staff as annoyances and as another meaningless expense.
Some organizations make only token efforts toward compliance, and those efforts are typically the least that can be done for the least cost. There is often an incomplete, one-time effort to "get compliant," but after that, nothing much more.
In Ericka Chickowski's recent article, "Healthcare Security Pros Need To Speak The Language Of Finance," Rick Kam pointed out healthcare security issues, "basically put the CFO and the CEO to sleep because they're talking compliance, talking costs, and talking about things that are not that interesting to these executives."
While there are exceptions, I think Ken's observation is THE reality for many organizations, even if no one will openly admit it. A common course of action by this type of leadership is usually one of three approaches: postpone, ignore, or delegate.
Postponement is easy to emotionally justify. "I'm very busy. I need to wait until I have time to really understand everything and not make a bad decision." The problem here is that security dangers don't care if you wait or not, they will continue to put the organization's information and reputation at risk.
IT professionals can make tremendous progress on security initiatives using the HIPAA Security Rule for leverage. In our Security Via HIPAA Compliance report, we'll explain how. (Free registration required.)
Published: 2015-05-02 Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco Finesse Server 10.0(1), 10.5(1), 10.6(1), and 11.0(1) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCut53595.
Published: 2015-05-01 Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 ignores the permission to deny snapshot creation during live storage migration between domains, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (prevent host start) by creating a long snapshot chain.
Published: 2015-05-01 Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 uses weak permissions on the directories shared by the ovirt-engine-dwhd service and a plugin during service startup, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading files in the directory.
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.