Risk
11/8/2010
11:59 AM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Microsoft Internet Explorer Zero-Day Under Attack

The risk surrounding a new zero-day Microsoft Internet Explorer vulnerability increased significantly over the weekend and could prompt an emergency patch release from the software company at any time.

The risk surrounding a new zero-day Microsoft Internet Explorer vulnerability increased significantly over the weekend and could prompt an emergency patch release from the software company at any time.On November 3, Microsoft warned customers of limited attacks against a new Internet Explorer vulnerability. Using the flaw detailed below by the company, attackers can target Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8 while Internet Explorer 9 is not affected:

Internet Explorer incorrectly under-allocates memory to store a certain combination of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) tags when parsing HTML. This could result in an overwrite of the least significant byte of a vtable pointer. An attacker able to spray memory with a specific pattern could potentially execute code in the context of the process parsing the HTML. The defense against heap spray style attacks is Data Execution Prevention (DEP).

DEP is enabled by default in Internet Explorer 8, and users should consider enabling it in earlier versions.

Users of Internet Explorer might want to do so quickly, as security researcher Roger Thompson noted in his blog that attack software for this vulnerability has been incorporated in the Eleonore Exploit Kit saying that "This raises the stakes considerably, as it means that anyone can buy the kit for a few hundred bucks, and they have a working 0-day."

Microsoft is due to release its scheduled monthly batch of security patches tomorrow, but don't expect this Internet Explorer flaw to be one of them. Microsoft has said it will release a critical flaw in multiple versions of its Microsoft Office suite as well as a fix for its Forefront Unified Access Gateway.

The good news here is that this month administrators won't have to contend with anything near the whopping 49 vulnerabilities last month.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, find me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Why else would HR ask me if I have a handicap?"
Current Issue
The Changing Face of Identity Management
Mobility and cloud services are altering the concept of user identity. Here are some ways to keep up.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.