Risk
4/27/2010
05:28 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Medical Records Keep Getting Dumped

Why were possibly thousands of private patient records found dumped outside the closed offices of a physical therapy center?

Why were possibly thousands of private patient records found dumped outside the closed offices of a physical therapy center?According to the story Patient files found dumped in Monticello officials in Monticello NY found a pile of files containing Social Security numbers and private patient information out in the open.

The story says that a clerk working in a nearby retail store noticed that a stack of 15 boxes remained outside the building for more than a week.

Apparently the offices of DRC Physical Therapy Plus were shut down, as an eviction notice was on the front door dated April 8.

I guess in all of the hullabaloo, no one thought to secure the patient data, or dispose of it properly.

Unfortunately, this sort of thing happens way too often. Here's a story from Chattanooga, TN on May 16 of last year detailing "Thousands" Of Medical Records Discovered In Recycling Bin:

Anyone who peered inside the mixed paper bin at the Dupont Recycling Center this afternoon got an eyeful. Files, in plain sight, which authorities say contained sensitive medical and identity information.

"Upon finding those, they discovered it wasn't a small amount. it was a large amount that we had to notify hutcheson medical center and one other medical facility," says Investigator William Puckett with the Chattanooga Police Department.

Investigators thought they could fit all of the files into a single car, but there was just too many files for that to be possible.

There is also this story from Florida earlier this year, Medical files in Port St. Lucie trash bin could have led to ID fraud, police say:

Police determined the files, which contained information including patient names, Social Security numbers, phone numbers and addresses, had been discarded from University Medical Clinics in the 1800 block of Southeast Port St. Lucie Boulevard, said Officer Tom Nichols, police spokesman.

A man identified by Nichols as a high ranking official with the company indicated an employee had thrown the files way.

"A garbage bag full of medical records is not an oversight," Nichols said.

With all of the attention toward securing patient data during the past couple of years, it's a shame to see health care providers aren't doing more to protect their patients' interests. But while it's a shame, it's certainly no surprise. Consider this from a story, Medical Data At Risk, penned by Nicole Lewis earlier this month:

A new study from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society reports that since January 2008, more than 110 healthcare organizations have reported the loss of sensitive patient data affecting over 5,306,000 individuals.

The findings, published in the 2010 HIMSS Analytics Report: Security of Patient Data, show that the vast majority of the 250 healthcare IT and security professionals surveyed have policies, procedures and technology in place at their organizations to prevent data theft. But changes made to protect medical records haven't curbed the number of reported breaches, which increased six percent since 2008.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, consider following me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-0714
Published: 2015-05-02
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco Finesse Server 10.0(1), 10.5(1), 10.6(1), and 11.0(1) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCut53595.

CVE-2014-3598
Published: 2015-05-01
The Jpeg2KImagePlugin plugin in Pillow before 2.5.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted image.

CVE-2014-8361
Published: 2015-05-01
The miniigd SOAP service in Realtek SDK allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted NewInternalClient request.

CVE-2015-0237
Published: 2015-05-01
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 ignores the permission to deny snapshot creation during live storage migration between domains, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (prevent host start) by creating a long snapshot chain.

CVE-2015-0257
Published: 2015-05-01
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 uses weak permissions on the directories shared by the ovirt-engine-dwhd service and a plugin during service startup, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading files in the directory.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.