Expert analysis finds the bad guys increasingly use stronger encryption to protect their malware and botnets.
When a new software threat is discovered, reverse engineers dig into the code to find ways to detect the attack, identify the code and its authors, and discover the purpose behind the malware.
Such investigations pit the digital detectives who reverse engineer malicious programs against the developers who created the malware. In the cat-and-mouse game, reverse engineers can easily find copies of the software to crack open and analyze, and attackers respond by throwing up a number of hurdles to slow down analysts' efforts. Chief among the roadblocks are encryption and obfuscation.
In the not-too-distant past, encryption in malware was a sign of an ambitious effort on the part of the program's author. Today, nearly all malware uses some encryption, and perhaps two-thirds of botnets use encrypted communications to obfuscate their activities, says Jeff Edwards, a research analyst with network security firm Arbor Networks.
"There is a gradual trend toward improving their encryption," Edward says. "It all comes down to whether the botnet operators and authors feel pressure to evolve."
With the takedown of the Rustock and Kelihos botnets, which counted tens of thousands of compromised computers among their nodes, the underground operators controlling the botnets are likely feeling pressure to hide their activities to an even greater extent. In addition, as malicious software developers grow more experienced, they frequently add more complex and better implemented encryption to their products.
The Black Energy bot software, for example, originally used a basic encryptor to scramble its executable to avoid detection by antivirus software and used Base64 encoding to scramble its communications. Both were easily reversed engineered. The latest version of Black Energy, however, uses a variant--somewhat flawed, it turns out--of the more robust RC4 stream cipher to encode its communications.
In a recent set of blog posts, Arbor Networks analyzed the encryption of four major bot programs used for denial-of-service. The analyses have found a wide variety of encryption methods, from custom substitution algorithms to the RC4 stream cipher, a popular encryption method used in Secure Sockets Layer, among other protocols. In one analysis, Arbor researched the Dark Comet remote access trojan, which uses RC4 to encrypt its communications and uses other interesting techniques to obfuscate the encryption keys.
"It's all over the map--you get everything from no encryption to really solid encryption," Edward says. "RC4 is the most popular one right now, or some variation of RC4. It's a standard, it's well understood, and it's reasonably secure."
Encryption in botnets has evolved slowly. Five years ago, the Sinowal, or Torpig, trojan used a modified version of the XTEA block cipher to encrypt its configuration data, according to Kurt Baumgartner, senior security researcher with Kaspersky Lab. Since late 2008, the Waledac and Kelihos, or Hlux, botnets used custom implementations of the advanced encryption standard (AES) mixed with other encoding and compression to obfuscate their code and communications, he says.
See the future of business technology at Interop Las Vegas, May 6-10. It's the best place to learn how cloud computing, mobile, video, virtualization, and other key technologies work together to drive business. Register today with priority code CPQCNL07 to get a free Expo Pass or to save 25% on Flex and Conference passes..
Published: 2015-07-06 Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the template preview function in Foreman before 1.6.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted provisioning template.
Published: 2015-07-06 The Hospira LifeCare PCA Infusion System before 7.0 does not validate network traffic associated with sending a (1) drug library, (2) software update, or (3) configuration change, which allows remote attackers to modify settings or medication data via packets on the (a) TELNET, (b) HTTP, (c) HTTPS, ...
Published: 2015-07-06 Open redirect vulnerability in the Language Switcher Dropdown module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.4 for Drupal allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in a block.
Published: 2015-07-06 Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Tournament module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.2 for Drupal allow remote authenticated users with certain permissions to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an (1) account username, a (2) node title, or a (3) team entity title.
Published: 2015-07-06 Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Node Field module 7.x-2.x before 7.x-2.45 for Drupal allows remote authenticated users with certain permissions to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors involving internal fields.