Risk
5/28/2010
01:56 PM
50%
50%

IBM Distributes Malware At Security Conference

Promotional USB thumb drives carried an unintended freebie: a keystroke-monitoring Windows worm.

Call it a stealth attack: Attendees at this month's AusCERT information security conference in Australia received an apologetic e-mail last week from IBM warning them that gratis promotional USB thumb drives the company distributed came installed with an unintended freebie: malware.

"At the AusCERT conference this week, you may have collected a complimentary USB key from the IBM booth," IBM's chief technologist in Australia, Glenn Wightwick, wrote to attendees. "Unfortunately we have discovered that some of these USB keys contained malware and we suspect that all USB keys may be affected."

It warned recipients to not use the drives, and requested their return to a postage-free address.

IBM didn't name the malware in question, noting only that it "is contained in the setup.exe and "autorun.ini" files, had been around since at least 2008, and could be detected "by the majority of antivirus products" on the market.

It warned that the malware would automatically run, and advised anyone who had actually plugged in the offending thumb drive to "contact your IT administrator for assessment, remediation and removal."

According to Graham Cluley at Sophos, the drives contained two different pieces of malware: The setup file is known as LibHack-A, and refers to "often otherwise legitimate applications that have been altered to load a malicious library file with a .dat extension," said Cluley on the Sophos blog. Thankfully, a crucial component is missing, which means it doesn't work.

But that's not true for the other piece of malware, a keystroke-monitoring Windows worm known as Agent-FWF. "Hardly the kind of code a security researcher would want running on their computer," said Cluley.

What can other companies do to ensure that their USB thumb drives aren't delivering hidden extras to conference-goers and potential customers? For starters, while auto-run features may seem mandatory to ensure that thumb-drive recipients receive your marketing message, avoid them.

"Auto-run files seem like a good idea because they force the user to view your pre-loaded information but you do, as IBM have discovered, run a very small risk with auto-run files of introducing malware," Phil Battison, director at memory stick vendor USB2U, said in a statement. Better, he said, to stick to just data files, such as Word documents, Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint decks, or PDFs.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest, Dec. 19, 2014
Software-defined networking can be a net plus for security. The key: Work with the network team to implement gradually, test as you go, and take the opportunity to overhaul your security strategy.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2004-2771
Published: 2014-12-24
The expand function in fio.c in Heirloom mailx 12.5 and earlier and BSD mailx 8.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in an email address.

CVE-2014-3569
Published: 2014-12-24
The ssl23_get_client_hello function in s23_srvr.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1j does not properly handle attempts to use unsupported protocols, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an unexpected handshake, as demonstrated by an SSLv3 handshak...

CVE-2014-4322
Published: 2014-12-24
drivers/misc/qseecom.c in the QSEECOM driver for the Linux kernel 3.x, as used in Qualcomm Innovation Center (QuIC) Android contributions for MSM devices and other products, does not validate certain offset, length, and base values within an ioctl call, which allows attackers to gain privileges or c...

CVE-2014-6132
Published: 2014-12-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI in IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository (WSRR) 6.3 through 6.3.0.5, 7.0.x through 7.0.0.5, 7.5.x through 7.5.0.4, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.3, and 8.5.x before 8.5.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML vi...

CVE-2014-6153
Published: 2014-12-24
The Web UI in IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository (WSRR) 6.3.x through 6.3.0.5, 7.0.x through 7.0.0.5, 7.5.x through 7.5.0.4, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.3, and 8.5.x before 8.5.0.1 does not set the secure flag for a cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture ...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.