Risk
2/16/2010
04:09 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Sorry About Buzz Privacy

But the company's apology isn't enough for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which has just filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission.

Google on Saturday apologized for bungling the Buzz launch and announced a second set of changes to its new social networking service to prevent it from compromising user privacy.

In a blog post, product manager Todd Jackson said that the buzz spread by the Buzz service, along with other forms of feedback, told the company that Buzz had problems. "We quickly realized that we didn't get everything quite right," he said. "We're very sorry for the concern we've caused and have been working hard ever since to improve things based on your feedback. We'll continue to do so."

On Thursday, Jackson said Google had decided to make the option to not display follower information on public profiles more visible. He also said that Google had made it possible to block followers who have not created a Google Profile and had made information about followers more clear.

On Saturday, Jackson acknowledged that the changes were insufficient and said that instead of automatically setting up people to follow, Buzz will now merely suggest people to follow.

Suggested people to follow will be listed with checked boxes next to their names. To start following these people, Buzz users will have to click on a menu option that says, "Follow selected people and start using Buzz."

Jackson also said that Buzz will no longer automatically connect to public Picasa Web Albums and shared items in Google Reader. And he said that Google plans to add a Buzz tab to its Gmail Settings menu, to make it easier to disassociate Buzz with Gmail or disable it.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) on Tuesday filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission about Google Buzz. "The primary issue is that users who signed up for Gmail have now found themselves users of a social networking service," said Jared Kaprove, EPIC's domestic surveillance counsel, in a phone interview. "E-mail is not completely private, but it's ordinarily thought of as a private process."

The problem, as framed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "is that your e-mail and chat contacts are not necessarily people you want to advertise as friends via a public social network."

Kaprove says that despite the changes, Google Buzz remains essentially an opt-out service. "What they call a 'suggest model' still results in a screen with the boxes checked," he explained. To make the service more strictly opt-in, Kaprove suggests that the check boxes to follow people on Buzz should be in an unchecked state by default.

Google has traditionally preferred to set up services so that people have to opt-out rather than opt-in. Google's book scanning effort, Google News, and its search index all operate on the assumption that content owners want to be included.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Five Emerging Security Threats - And What You Can Learn From Them
At Black Hat USA, researchers unveiled some nasty vulnerabilities. Is your organization ready?
Flash Poll
Dark Reading Strategic Security Report: The Impact of Enterprise Data Breaches
Dark Reading Strategic Security Report: The Impact of Enterprise Data Breaches
Social engineering, ransomware, and other sophisticated exploits are leading to new IT security compromises every day. Dark Reading's 2016 Strategic Security Survey polled 300 IT and security professionals to get information on breach incidents, the fallout they caused, and how recent events are shaping preparations for inevitable attacks in the coming year. Download this report to get a look at data from the survey and to find out what a breach might mean for your organization.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Security researchers are finding that there's a growing market for the vulnerabilities they discover and persistent conundrum as to the right way to disclose them. Dark Reading editors will speak to experts -- Veracode CTO and co-founder Chris Wysopal and HackerOne co-founder and CTO Alex Rice -- about bug bounties and the expanding market for zero-day security vulnerabilities.