Risk
7/28/2010
03:04 PM
50%
50%

Google, Facebook, Apple Face Privacy Questions From Senators

Lawmakers are concerned about the tech companies' practice of collecting information about people's online activity and sharing it with third parties.

Executives from Google, Facebook and Apple faced questions over consumer privacy before a Senate panel this week that examined where the limit is when it comes to sharing people's online information and activity.

Representatives from the three companies -- each of which have raised concerns over privacy with their practices -- went before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee on Tuesday.

The committee convened to discuss consumer privacy and whether online companies' practices of tracking people's activity and sharing that information with third parties violates it.

Committee Chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., compared the practice of collecting information about people's behavior online to going into a shopping mall and having every move a person makes recorded, analyzed and shared with other people.

"This sounds like something fantastic, out of science fiction," he said. "But this fantastic scenario is essentially what happens every second of every day to anyone that uses the Internet."

Rockefeller said that it's likely many people don't know the extent to which online companies are collecting information about them, neither are they "empowered to stop certain practices from taking place."

"Do consumers realize computers are tracking what streets they walk on and what websites they visit?" he asked. He also questioned what benefit this sort of activity is to the web users themselves.

Generally senators expressed dismay over the scenario Rockefeller painted and stressed that privacy practices have to be taken seriously because many people are unaware of how their online activity is being tracked and used.

The panel convened as the Senate considers whether legislation is needed to protect personal information people share online from misuse. Congress is not expected to pass such legislation this year, but lawmakers expect it will be a priority for consideration in early 2011.

The issue has been especially thorny lately for the three companies given controversy over Google's collecting unsecured data from private Wi-Fi networks, Facebook's ever-changing privacy settings and the leak by AT&T of more than 100,000 email addresses of Apple iPad users.

In their defense, company executives told the panel they believe they are adequately informing people how their information might be used, and are as concerned about privacy as lawmakers are.

"Apple is strongly committed to giving our customers clear notice and control over their information, and we believe our products do this in a simple and elegant way," Guy Tribble, Apple's vice president of software technology, told the committee.

He said Apple shares the concerns of the committee about the collection and misuse of data, particularly privacy data.

Facebook's CTO Bret Taylor said that the company gives users what they need to control the privacy information, and that keeping track of how they behave online is crucial to the content of the site itself and how they use it to achieve Facebook's goal of linking people up online.

"The people who use Facebook … are the driving force behind the continued innovation and constant improvement of our service," he said. "Our goal is to make it simpler for people to connect and share, and to give them the tools to control their information."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cybersecurity's 'Broken' Hiring Process
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  10/11/2017
Ransomware Grabs Headlines but BEC May Be a Bigger Threat
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  10/12/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What did you expect from this SOC? A unicorn....
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
The State of Ransomware
The State of Ransomware
Ransomware has become one of the most prevalent new cybersecurity threats faced by today's enterprises. This new report from Dark Reading includes feedback from IT and IT security professionals about their organization's ransomware experiences, defense plans, and malware challenges. Find out what they had to say!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.