Risk
7/28/2010
03:04 PM
50%
50%

Google, Facebook, Apple Face Privacy Questions From Senators

Lawmakers are concerned about the tech companies' practice of collecting information about people's online activity and sharing it with third parties.

Executives from Google, Facebook and Apple faced questions over consumer privacy before a Senate panel this week that examined where the limit is when it comes to sharing people's online information and activity.

Representatives from the three companies -- each of which have raised concerns over privacy with their practices -- went before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee on Tuesday.

The committee convened to discuss consumer privacy and whether online companies' practices of tracking people's activity and sharing that information with third parties violates it.

Committee Chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., compared the practice of collecting information about people's behavior online to going into a shopping mall and having every move a person makes recorded, analyzed and shared with other people.

"This sounds like something fantastic, out of science fiction," he said. "But this fantastic scenario is essentially what happens every second of every day to anyone that uses the Internet."

Rockefeller said that it's likely many people don't know the extent to which online companies are collecting information about them, neither are they "empowered to stop certain practices from taking place."

"Do consumers realize computers are tracking what streets they walk on and what websites they visit?" he asked. He also questioned what benefit this sort of activity is to the web users themselves.

Generally senators expressed dismay over the scenario Rockefeller painted and stressed that privacy practices have to be taken seriously because many people are unaware of how their online activity is being tracked and used.

The panel convened as the Senate considers whether legislation is needed to protect personal information people share online from misuse. Congress is not expected to pass such legislation this year, but lawmakers expect it will be a priority for consideration in early 2011.

The issue has been especially thorny lately for the three companies given controversy over Google's collecting unsecured data from private Wi-Fi networks, Facebook's ever-changing privacy settings and the leak by AT&T of more than 100,000 email addresses of Apple iPad users.

In their defense, company executives told the panel they believe they are adequately informing people how their information might be used, and are as concerned about privacy as lawmakers are.

"Apple is strongly committed to giving our customers clear notice and control over their information, and we believe our products do this in a simple and elegant way," Guy Tribble, Apple's vice president of software technology, told the committee.

He said Apple shares the concerns of the committee about the collection and misuse of data, particularly privacy data.

Facebook's CTO Bret Taylor said that the company gives users what they need to control the privacy information, and that keeping track of how they behave online is crucial to the content of the site itself and how they use it to achieve Facebook's goal of linking people up online.

"The people who use Facebook … are the driving force behind the continued innovation and constant improvement of our service," he said. "Our goal is to make it simpler for people to connect and share, and to give them the tools to control their information."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Why else would HR ask me if I have a handicap?"
Current Issue
The Changing Face of Identity Management
Mobility and cloud services are altering the concept of user identity. Here are some ways to keep up.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.