Risk
12/11/2009
03:45 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Douses Privacy Fire

CEO Eric Schmidt's remarks are being taken out of context, the company says.

Recent remarks by Google CEO Eric Schmidt in a CNBC interview have set off a firestorm among privacy advocates.

The controversy has even prompted Asa Dotzler, community development manager for Mozilla -- which depends on Google for revenue -- to recommend Microsoft's Bing search engine as an alternative to Google.

"People are treating Google like their most trusted friend," said CNBC's Maria Bartiromo in the interview. "Should they be?"

Passing on the opportunity to explain to Bartiromo the difference between trusted friends and multi-billion dollar search advertising companies, Schmidt responded, "I think judgment matters. ...If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place. If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines--including Google--do retain this information for some time. And it's important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities."

Schmidt's remarks about the availability of search data to law enforcement demands have been seized on by privacy advocates as evidence of overall disregard for privacy on the part of both Schmidt and Google. Divorced from the context of the conversation, his statement sounds to critics like a reiteration of the commonly cited and just as commonly refuted pro-surveillance argument that those who have nothing to hide have nothing to fear.

"I think that the thing that bothers me most about Google CEO Eric Schmidt's comment is that it makes clear that he simply doesn't understand privacy," said Doztler in a blog post on Thursday. "That a company with so much user data on its servers is led by someone who just doesn't understand privacy is really scary to me and it should be scary to you as well."

The Electronic Frontier Foundation made a similar observation. "Unfortunately, Schmidt's statement makes it seem as if Google, a company that claims to care about privacy, is not even concerned enough to understand basic lessons about privacy and why it's important on so many levels -- from protection against shallow embarrassments to the preservation of freedom and human rights," the cyber rights group said on Thursday.

Google says such criticism takes Schmidt's remarks out of context.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-0999
Published: 2015-06-02
Sendio before 7.2.4 includes the session identifier in URLs in emails, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and hijack sessions by reading the jsessionid parameter in the Referrer HTTP header.

CVE-2014-8391
Published: 2015-06-02
The Web interface in Sendio before 7.2.4 does not properly handle sessions, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information from other users' sessions via a large number of request.

CVE-2015-0759
Published: 2015-06-02
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

CVE-2015-0850
Published: 2015-06-02
The Git plugin for FusionForge before 6.0rc4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an unspecified parameter when creating a secondary Git repository.

CVE-2015-1945
Published: 2015-06-02
Unspecified vulnerability in the Reference Data Management component in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management 10.1, 11.0, 11.3 before FP3, and 11.4 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unknown vectors.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
From Target to Sony to Anthem, they are happening all around you: the “big” data breaches that compromise critical data and threaten the welfare of the corporate brand. Is your organization ready to respond?