Risk
10/11/2013
02:07 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Ads Will Feature You

A change in the company's terms of service will put your name and picture in ads shown to your friends.

Google on Friday altered its Terms of Service to allow it to include users' Google+ profile names and pictures in Google products, including advertisements, reviews and other commercial offerings.

Google grants itself permission to do this by default, but allows users to opt out of appearing in ads through its new Shared Endorsements in Ads setting. The company attempts to discourage users from revoking the permission by displaying this message when the checkbox is deselected: "Are you sure? When you disable this setting, your friends will be less likely to benefit from your recommendations."

The opt-out option is limited in scope, however: Google will still employ users' names and photos in Shared Endorsements related to reviews, +1, follows and other promotional services. You were expecting something for nothing?

Google's move echoes Facebook's decision in August to revise its Proposed Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Facebook granted itself the right to employ users' names, profile pictures, content and information, without compensation, in ads and sponsored content. Facebook, however, has not offered a way to opt out, which also isn't available to users who would prefer to be visible in Graph Search.

[ Time to reset your permissions? Read Facebook Unfriends Another Privacy Setting. ]

Facebook was forced to delay its policy changes after privacy groups and lawmakers complained that Facebook was violating its 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission by failing to give users a say in the change. The agreement stipulated that Facebook had to obtain consent from users before making policy changes. Facebook's chief privacy officer, Erin Egan, told the Los Angeles Times last month that the company wasn't making changes as much as providing additional information.

It remains to be seen whether that subtle distinction will fly with regulators and whether Google will face similar blowback.

On Twitter, marketers see Google's entry into the selling of user endorsements as an affirmation of the power of word-of-mouth marketing. Outside of the world of advertising, observers are less sanguine.

New Yorker TV critic Emily Nussbaum declared, "This is despicable and makes me hate Google."

Santa Clara University law professor Eric Goldman proposed opting out as a form of protest. "If enough folks opt-out of Shared Endorsements, maybe we can remind Google to innovate, not ape Facebook's bad ideas," he said in a Twitter posting.

The last time Google presented a change of this magnitude was in 2012, when the company said it planned to unify its privacy policies so it could treat its diverse portfolio of online services as a single service in matters of privacy. Though there was considerable outcry at the time, the change went through and Google emerged with even greater marketing power: a unified user data set. Expect more of the same: sound and fury, signifying nothing, followed by friend-fortified product pitches.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
BanFrenchRoast
50%
50%
BanFrenchRoast,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/11/2013 | 7:36:56 PM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
This is flipping Evil with a captial E. Advertising huckster can buy your "personal" recommendation that you never made.

Google and Facebook are a 1,000 times worse than the NSA for personal abuse of information. Do not tell them a damn thing or tell only distortions.
LeonD832
50%
50%
LeonD832,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/11/2013 | 7:52:28 PM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
Google should innovate, not ape Facebook's bad ideas and the way to do that is a a shared profit agreement with the user regarding User Profile promotion stuff
anon1664417601
50%
50%
anon1664417601,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/11/2013 | 7:56:27 PM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
Making my G+ profile picture my middle finger, then when all my friends get ad's with my new picture, it will be worth staying on.
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/11/2013 | 7:56:30 PM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
So they think the way to compete with Facebook is to copy all the things people like least about Facebook? Way to go.
MarciaNWC
50%
50%
MarciaNWC,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/11/2013 | 9:46:07 PM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
Google could do more to inform users about this policy change than a little banner notice.
Somedude8
50%
50%
Somedude8,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/12/2013 | 5:08:05 PM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
Oh, the possibility for hi jinks and funnies is almost off the chart with this!
philburton
50%
50%
philburton,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/13/2013 | 5:24:08 AM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
Which is why I don't have a Google + account.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Moderator
10/14/2013 | 9:07:42 PM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
Apparently, a number of Google+ users have changed their Profile pictures to an image of Eric Schmidt as a form of protest.
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/15/2013 | 3:47:29 AM
re: Google Ads Will Feature You
Google is following Facebook into the advertising gutter. Hard to believe.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest, Dec. 19, 2014
Software-defined networking can be a net plus for security. The key: Work with the network team to implement gradually, test as you go, and take the opportunity to overhaul your security strategy.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3580
Published: 2014-12-18
The mod_dav_svn Apache HTTPD server module in Apache Subversion 1.x before 1.7.19 and 1.8.x before 1.8.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and server crash) via a REPORT request for a resource that does not exist.

CVE-2014-4801
Published: 2014-12-18
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Rational Quality Manager 2.x through 2.0.1.1, 3.x before 3.0.1.6 iFix 4, 4.x before 4.0.7 iFix 2, and 5.x before 5.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.

CVE-2014-6076
Published: 2014-12-18
IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1 and Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP10 and 8.x before 8.0.1 allow remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web site.

CVE-2014-6077
Published: 2014-12-18
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1 and Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP10 and 8.x before 8.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

CVE-2014-6078
Published: 2014-12-18
IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1 and Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP10 and 8.x before 8.0.1 do not have a lockout period after invalid login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain admin access via a brute-force attack.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.