Risk
12/8/2009
10:25 AM
Bob Evans
Bob Evans
Commentary
50%
50%

Global CIO: Steve Jobs Is Bugs Bunny But Microsoft Is Elmer Fudd

Windows 7 is nice, Bing is neat, Sharepoint is solid, and Azure is promising. But does Microsoft scare the crap out of any of its competitors anymore?

Quick--when was the last time Microsoft dazzled you with breakthrough thinking and agenda-setting innovation?

What was the last Microsoft product you couldn't wait to get your hands on, that would make a huge impact on your enterprise?

When you and your team put together your list of Five IT Vendors We Can't Live Without, does Microsoft still make the cut?

Now consider Steve Jobs and Apple:

They took on the incredibly hidebound and entrenched music industry and blew it to pieces with the truly historic iPod and iTunes.

Then they leveraged that iPod distribution model and revolutionized how people think about apps, how people create apps, how people market and distribute apps, and how people consume apps.

And they have exerted a profound and global impact on all manner of products and services as thousands of other companies have picked up on Apple's core philosophies of engaging customers as co-creators of value and ideas, of seeing the world through the eyes and desires of customers instead of purely through the lens of least-cost manufacturing.

I think a lot of companies fear Apple, and they fear it not because of its financial might (though it is vast), nor because of its brilliant suite of products (though it is intimidating), nor because of its marketing (though it is outstanding).

No, I think lots of companies inside and outside the tech business fear Apple because it is the ultimate disrupter and the crusher of the status quo. It is the blazing, roadkill-making thing in the night those companies fear they will never see coming, either through the windshield or in the rearview mirror.

They fear the magic of Steve Jobs and Apple. They fear Jobs' cunning and daring, his audacious and relentless refusal to play by the rules that trap so many other companies in the killing box of predictability, his willingness to blast head-on into so-called untouchables like digital-rights management, and his steadfast contempt for the average, the good-enough, the expected.

Those companies--most companies--want things to be predictable and comfortable. But Steve Jobs and Apple just don't do predictable and comfortable, and they make it harder and harder for others to do predictable and comfortable because the buying public--consumers and businesses alike--are becoming accustomed to having it their way instead of the seller's way.

A lot of companies used to fear Microsoft, too, and I'd be remiss if I failed to say that a fair number of the frightened were Microsoft's own customers!

But now? I'd say that for a lot of tech companies, the formerly frightened have split into two camps: one that regards Microsoft with a wary respect and awareness, along with some accommodation, and also a second and growing cadre of software companies that have flipped the fear-vector 180 degrees and have now become the hunter with Microsoft as the prey.

They see Microsoft as drifting toward fat and complacent, prone to bold talk but tepid action, and increasingly satisfied with being a not-so-fast follower instead of the brash and aggressive embracer of high-risk strategies and approaches that enabled Microsoft to dominate markets by sheer dint of its unmatched will and its sometimes-brutal assault on any and all obstacles between it and the top spot.

Global CIO
Global CIOs: A Site Just For You
Visit InformationWeek's Global CIO -- our new online community and information resource for CIOs operating in the global economy.
As my colleague and Microsoft expert Paul McDougall wrote almost two years ago about the danger to Microsoft in acquiring Yahoo, "The fact is, Microsoft reached its zenith at a time when PC buyers had little choice but to purchase a Windows-based machine. The culture of monopoly born of that still infuses most of the company's offerings today, even in markets where buyers have lots to choose from."

What happened? How did Steve Jobs and Apple slip so smoothly into the slick and indomitable Bugs Bunny while Microsoft let itself become the tongue-tied and bumbling Elmer Fudd whose aggression seems maxed out in merely asking where oh where has that wacky wabbit gone? Here's the big problem Microsoft faces:

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest, Dec. 19, 2014
Software-defined networking can be a net plus for security. The key: Work with the network team to implement gradually, test as you go, and take the opportunity to overhaul your security strategy.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3971
Published: 2014-12-25
The CmdAuthenticate::_authenticateX509 function in db/commands/authentication_commands.cpp in mongod in MongoDB 2.6.x before 2.6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) by attempting authentication with an invalid X.509 client certificate.

CVE-2014-7193
Published: 2014-12-25
The Crumb plugin before 3.0.0 for Node.js does not properly restrict token access in situations where a hapi route handler has CORS enabled, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, and potentially obtain the ability to spoof requests to non-CORS routes, via a crafted web site ...

CVE-2004-2771
Published: 2014-12-24
The expand function in fio.c in Heirloom mailx 12.5 and earlier and BSD mailx 8.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in an email address.

CVE-2014-3569
Published: 2014-12-24
The ssl23_get_client_hello function in s23_srvr.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1j does not properly handle attempts to use unsupported protocols, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an unexpected handshake, as demonstrated by an SSLv3 handshak...

CVE-2014-4322
Published: 2014-12-24
drivers/misc/qseecom.c in the QSEECOM driver for the Linux kernel 3.x, as used in Qualcomm Innovation Center (QuIC) Android contributions for MSM devices and other products, does not validate certain offset, length, and base values within an ioctl call, which allows attackers to gain privileges or c...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.