Risk
9/25/2013
10:27 AM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

FISMA Security Approach Falls Short, Fed IT Pros Say

Primary tool for defending government information systems is inadequate in the battle against cyber threats and attacks, federal IT security managers say.

Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
(click image for larger view)
The primary statutory framework for defending government information systems -- the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) -- is falling short in the battle against cyber threats and attacks, creating a compelling need for new strategies, such as continuous monitoring, to improve security at agencies, federal cybersecurity professionals say.

Only about half of the federal IT security managers polled in a survey released this week said that FISMA has improved security at their agencies. Just 27% reported that their agencies are "currently perfectly compliant" with FISMA.

The polling figures suggest that efforts to push FISMA compliance have made little headway since a March 2012 assessment conducted by the Office of Management and Budget.

While 62% of respondents in the new survey believed that increased FISMA compliance would improve security, the survey also revealed that many security managers lack overall confidence in FISMA. They said FISMA is antiquated (11%), is insufficient in dealing with today's increasingly sophisticated threat landscape (21%), and encourages compliance rather than risk identification and assessment (28%). Moreover, 86% reported that FISMA compliance increases costs.

[ Warning about trouble isn't the same as stopping trouble. Read Federal DDoS Warnings Are Outdated. ]

The findings were based on an online survey of more than 200 federal IT managers conducted in July, and made available in a report, "FISMA Fallout," produced by MeriTalk and underwritten by NetApp.

An effort to reform FISMA, which was signed into law in 2002 and requires the head of each agency to implement policies and procedures to reduce IT security risks, is underway in Congress. The Federal Information Security Amendments Act of 2013 (HR 1163) was passed unanimously by the House last April and referred to the Senate. The bill, introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), establishes stronger oversight of federal agency IT systems by focusing on "automated and continuous monitoring" of cybersecurity threats and by regular "threat assessments."

Approximately one-fourth of the respondents in the survey (27%) agreed that FISMA could be improved with new requirements such as continuous monitoring.

Asked how FISMA can be reformed, managers in the survey recommended:

-- Get rid of the scorecard mindset and improve metrics as whole;

-- Take into account a realistic picture of agency budgets in light of sequestration;

-- Require less rote compliance documentation and more assessment and risk analysis;

-- Establish clear requirements that need to be met for different risk levels; and

-- Develop a consistent tool to capture data, store documents, and continually update and maintain information.

Beyond issues directly related to FISMA, only 22% of federal security pros in the survey rated their current cybersecurity as sustainable. Another 22% said their security systems were sustainable -- but for only the next 12 months. And 21% said their systems were currently near the limit of sustainability.

In addition, current network capacity is also hindering security efforts, the survey found. More than half (55%) of IT professionals polled said their agency networks are either increasingly overloaded with data or they were not able to keep up with the amount of data already crossing their networks.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/25/2013 | 9:56:23 PM
re: FISMA Security Approach Falls Short, Fed IT Pros Say
While these findings may be a fresh take on an antiquated law, the reality is that IT security pros -- and NIST -- have long since dismissed relying on FISMA to address security threats in favor of risk-based assessments and continuous monitoring. The irony is, by the time Congress updates FISMA to require continuous monitoring, agencies will be on to a more comprehensive approach. The Department of Homeland Security's Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (CDM) approach is where agenies need to be headed. In the meantime, let's hope Congress gets agencies out of the business of creating binders of paper documents every year to comply with FISMA's current requirements.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7392
Published: 2014-07-22
Gitlist allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a file name to Source/.

CVE-2014-2385
Published: 2014-07-22
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the web UI in Sophos Anti-Virus for Linux before 9.6.1 allow local users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) newListList:ExcludeFileOnExpression, (2) newListList:ExcludeFilesystems, or (3) newListList:ExcludeMountPaths parameter t...

CVE-2014-3518
Published: 2014-07-22
jmx-remoting.sar in JBoss Remoting, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JEAP) 5.2.0, Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1, Red Hat JBoss Portal Platform 5.2.2, and Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5.3.1, does not properly implement the JSR 160 specification, which allows remote attackers to exec...

CVE-2014-3530
Published: 2014-07-22
The org.picketlink.common.util.DocumentUtil.getDocumentBuilderFactory method in PicketLink, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 5.2.0 and 6.2.4, expands entity references, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary code and possibly have other unspecified impact via...

CVE-2014-4326
Published: 2014-07-22
Elasticsearch Logstash 1.0.14 through 1.4.x before 1.4.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted event in (1) zabbix.rb or (2) nagios_nsca.rb in outputs/.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Where do information security startups come from? More important, how can I tell a good one from a flash in the pan? Learn how to separate ITSec wheat from chaff in this episode.