Risk
10/6/2011
03:59 PM
50%
50%

Feds: Cloud Computing Doesn't Increase Security Risk

Administration officials tell Congress cloud security problems are no worse than other IT risks.

Top 20 Government Cloud Service Providers
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Top 20 Government Cloud Service Providers
Federal officials defended their move to adopt cloud computing, stressing steps federal agencies are taking to ensure the technology does not present greater cybersecurity risks than already exist today, on Capitol Hill Thursday.

"Our problems with security are not unique to cloud-computing systems," David McClure, associate administrator for the General Services Administration's (GSA's) Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies, told the House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies in a hearing about the security implications of the federal government's aggressive move to the cloud.

McClure was responding to a question by committee chairman Rep. Dan Lungren, who argued that the federal government has a responsibility to those who question whether cloud computing is a more easily penetrable system than in-house and legacy systems.

[The feds are taking a new approach to fighting national security threats. Learn more: Homeland Security Revamps Cyber Arm.]

To ease their fears, Lungren said, "you've got to have a promise that the security of the cloud is going to be measurably better than the security we have in the current system."

McClure agreed, but said that new security controls and standards the feds are working on will do that, although it's important to shore up cybersecurity across the board and not merely to protect new cloud systems.

Still, even if security measures won't convince doubters, cloud computing is something that is "inevitable" for the federal government to achieve cost-cutting goals and to keep up with where technology trends are going, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) CIO Richard Spires told the committee.

"Cloud computing is going to transform IT as things become more commoditized," he said. "We need to move to it."

The key measure agencies are taking to secure the use of both public and private cloud systems is the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, or FedRAMP, which centralizes security for cloud computing, addressing three critical problems that McClure outlined before the House Thursday.

The system will set up baseline security controls and continuous monitoring requirements, maintain assessment criteria for the security of cloud systems, and maintain an active inventory of approved systems, he said.

Officials, who introduced FedRAMP a year and a half ago, had said the program would be activated Oct. 1, but McClure said Thursday that it's coming "soon."

Once implemented, FedRAMP also will approve third parties to carry out government-wide security authorizations for cloud systems that then will be posted on a public website, making agencies more accountable for their security.

McClure said officials already have agreed on security controls for FedRAMP, and said that continuous monitoring will be the next step to making not just cloud implementations, but all agency systems more secure.

Indeed, continuous monitoring is a protection the feds are determined to implement. To this end, a new requirement of the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) holds agencies' feet to the fire. Agencies now must report security data monthly to an online compliance tool called Cyberscope to ensure compliance with FISMA, the standard for federal IT security.

Still, Gregory Wilshusen, director of information security issues for from the Government Accountability Office--who also testified before the panel Thursday--painted a slightly less optimistic picture of the feds' current cloud security efforts than his counterparts.

His testimony pointed out that cloud computing can indeed create new security risks, and agencies' efforts to address these risks remain incomplete, even as they already are deploying the cloud.

"Federal agencies have taken several steps to address our recommendations on cloud computing security, but more remains to be done," Wilshusen said.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jrapoza
50%
50%
jrapoza,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/7/2011 | 7:50:22 PM
re: Feds: Cloud Computing Doesn't Increase Security Risk
I think the main issue isn't that cloud increases risk but that many companies forget about security risk when they go to the cloud. Often when I ask companies about cloud security, the only thing they talk about is access control. Just because the server is running in the cloud doesn't mean it shouldn't be as thoroughly secured and protected as a server on the internal network.

Jim Rapoza Contributing Editor, InformationWeek
ITGuy.gr
50%
50%
ITGuy.gr,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/7/2011 | 1:29:11 PM
re: Feds: Cloud Computing Doesn't Increase Security Risk
Cloud computing compacts more data, therefore more value, in a single virtual location. Thereby, it decreases the cost for data extraction by hacking. This alone constitutes an increase in risk.

Read more about it in this blog post titled: "With a mind on the cloud, eyes on virtualization and feet planted firmly on the (datacenter) ground..."

http://www.itguy.gr/2011/10/wi...

n_dude
50%
50%
n_dude,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/7/2011 | 12:13:28 AM
re: Feds: Cloud Computing Doesn't Increase Security Risk
I agreee with Brian's comment. Cloud computing will not necessarily increase the level of risk, but rather will put forward a new set of risks which will revolve aorund how the customer identifies the new risks and gets adequate assurance over the cloud provider's controls. As I always say you can outsource a control or process, but you can never outsource responsibility for risk management.
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
10/6/2011 | 8:58:48 PM
re: Feds: Cloud Computing Doesn't Increase Security Risk
Increase risk? Not necessarily. Change risk? Yes. The important thing is understanding it and implementing proper security.
Brian Prince, InformationWeek contributor
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-1750
Published: 2015-07-01
Open redirect vulnerability in nokia-mapsplaces.php in the Nokia Maps & Places plugin 1.6.6 for WordPress allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the href parameter to page/place.html. NOTE: this was originally reported as cross-sit...

CVE-2014-1836
Published: 2015-07-01
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in htdocs/libraries/image-editor/image-edit.php in ImpressCMS before 1.3.6 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a full pathname in the image_path parameter in a cancel action.

CVE-2015-0848
Published: 2015-07-01
Heap-based buffer overflow in libwmf 0.2.8.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted BMP image.

CVE-2015-1330
Published: 2015-07-01
unattended-upgrades before 0.86.1 does not properly authenticate packages when the (1) force-confold or (2) force-confnew dpkg options are enabled in the DPkg::Options::* apt configuration, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to upload and execute arbitrary packages via unspecified vecto...

CVE-2015-1950
Published: 2015-07-01
IBM PowerVC Standard Edition 1.2.2.1 through 1.2.2.2 does not require authentication for access to the Python interpreter with nova credentials, which allows KVM guest OS users to discover certain PowerVC credentials and bypass intended access restrictions via unspecified Python code.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Marc Spitler, co-author of the Verizon DBIR will share some of the lesser-known but most intriguing tidbits from the massive report