Risk
4/30/2007
05:46 PM
50%
50%

E-Gold's Chairman Spoke Out Against Cybercrime, Until He Got Caught

I read with great interest about a Washington, D.C., federal grand jury's decision late last week to indict E Gold Ltd, Gold & Silver Reserve Inc., and the owners of these digital currency businesses on charges of money laundering, conspiracy, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. I recently served on a grand jury in Brooklyn, so I know the joke about being able to indict a ham sandwich to

I read with great interest about a Washington, D.C., federal grand jury's decision late last week to indict E Gold Ltd, Gold & Silver Reserve Inc., and the owners of these digital currency businesses on charges of money laundering, conspiracy, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. I recently served on a grand jury in Brooklyn, so I know the joke about being able to indict a ham sandwich to be true (the most circumstantial of evidence will get your case sent to trial).But I couldn't help thinking back to an exchange I had with e-gold chairman Douglas Jackson over a January 2006 blog in which I'd mentioned his company in the same breath as the hacker economy. Jackson was indignant over my portrayal of his company as a one that creates a loophole that enables cybercrooks to get paid for their misdeeds. At the time, he noted, "E-gold is often depicted in the media as anonymous and inaccessible to law enforcement." Now, he can make his case to the federal government or face up to 35 years in prison.

E-gold acts as an alternative payment system and is said to be backed by stored physical gold. To get an e-gold account, one needs only to provide a valid e-mail address. The beauty of the model is that any foreign currency can be dropped into the account and then exchanged for its value in gold, and account holders can access their accounts through the Internet and conduct anonymous transactions with other parties anywhere in the world.

The Justice Department believes this made e-gold popular with operators of investment scams, credit card and identity fraud, and sellers of online child pornography. But Jackson has said in public forums that e-gold's business is on the up and up. In response to my original blog, which described how purveyors of rootkits and other malware are able to sell their malicious wares without being caught by using services such as e-gold, Jackson wrote, "On this understanding, with about a minute of work, we investigated the matter, identified the e-gold account(s) used by these people and exercised our Right of Association, eliminating their ability to ever receive another e-gold payment. For good measure, we reached out and touched (in the same fashion) every e-gold account ever used to buy these wares from them using e-gold.""

Sounds like a pretty standup operation. But the Justice Department's indictment alleges, among other things, that Douglas L. Jackson, Reid A. Jackson, and Barry K. Downey "conducted funds transfers on behalf of their customers, knowing that the funds involved were the proceeds of unlawful activity; namely child exploitation, credit card fraud, and wire (investment) fraud; and thereby violated federal money laundering statutes."

My favorite line by Jackson in response to my blog is the following: "I note in passing that the blather about 'avoid[ing] the scrutiny of the Secret Service' is a crock of sh_t. If indeed a crime has been committed, all the data needed to identify, apprehend, and prosecute the malefactors is in our database, and will be forever, available pursuant to any lawful request." I edited the profanity in the quote because we like to think of InformationWeek as a family-friendly publication. Further, Jackson added that, "e-gold in no manner condones persons or organizations attempting to use e-gold to support criminal acts. The exact opposite is true. E-gold limits accounts that are suspect of illicit activity and has a long history of cooperation with law enforcement agencies."

As recently as Feb. 8, 2007, Jackson and I corresponded about e-gold's role within the hacker economy, and Jackson went as far as to position his organization as a group of cybercrime fighters, having "broke the back of two communities (CP and carders) that had infested e-gold and were damaging our brand/reputation." The "CP" in his quote refers to Carderplanet, a Web site that served as a marketplace for millions of stolen bank accounts. Wired magazine even chronicled Jackson's claims in a December 2006 story.

The Justice Department apparently was not impressed, pointing out last week that its indictment was the result of a two-and-a-half-year investigation by the Secret Service Orlando Field Office into an alternative payment system that has largely operated outside of normal banking industry regulations. Federal law enforcement sees e-gold as a system for supporting emerging threats and evolving criminal methods through the use of electronic or digital currency to facilitate trafficking in illicit goods and services.

It will be fascinating in the coming months to learn whether e-gold is simply a misunderstood crusader for cybersafety or a key enabler of identity theft. Hard to believe that it could be both (if you believe both Jackson and the Justice Department). One thing's for sure, federal law enforcement is onto to something in taking on any site that allows cybercriminals to get paid for their efforts.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6090
Published: 2015-04-27
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) DataMappingEditorCommands, (2) DatastoreEditorCommands, and (3) IEGEditorCommands servlets in IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 SP6 before EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.3 before 6.0.3.0 iFix8, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.5 iFix...

CVE-2014-6092
Published: 2015-04-27
IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 before SP6 EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.6, and 6.0.5 before 6.0.5.6 requires failed-login handling for web-service accounts to have the same lockout policy as for standard user accounts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause...

CVE-2015-0113
Published: 2015-04-27
The Jazz help system in IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 4.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Quality Manager 4.0 through 4.0.7 and 5.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Team Concert 4.0 through 4.0.7 and 5.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Requirements Composer 4.0 through 4.0.7, Rational DOORS Next Generation...

CVE-2015-0174
Published: 2015-04-27
The SNMP implementation in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 before 8.5.5.5 does not properly handle configuration data, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-0175
Published: 2015-04-27
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 Liberty Profile before 8.5.5.5 does not properly implement authData elements, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.