Risk
4/29/2010
11:47 AM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

Data Breaches More Costly In U.S. Than Elsewhere

Data breaches cost U.S. companies twice as much as they do in other countries, according to a new Ponemon Institute study. Which adds up to twice as many reasons not to get breached!

Data breaches cost U.S. companies twice as much as they do in other countries, according to a new Ponemon Institute study. Which adds up to twice as many reasons not to get breached!The array of regulations, laws and disclosure requirements that come into play when company data is breached have raised the cost of those breaches higher in the U.S. than Europe, a new global study from the Ponemon Institute shows.

According to the study, sponsored by security company PGP. U.S. companies incur costs averaging $204 per compromised record. In Germany, where disclosure and other regulations are being strengthened, the average cost is $177; in the U.K., whose regulations are relatively lax (so far; this will change in the next year or two) the cost is under $100 per record.

Globally, the average cost per record is $143.

As Germany's figures show, the cost of breaches increases along with the reach of legislation and regulation.

How much of an increase? Check this out: Ponemon reports that between 2005 and 2009 the average company cost of a breach incident rose from 4.5 million to 6.65 million.

Stricter regulation, and concerns about being in violation of those regulations following a breach, may lead some companies to over-spend on notifications, alerting all customers of a possible breach, when only a limited number of records were actually compromised.

Not that avoiding notification is any kind of solution. As a Ponemon executive pointed out, bluntly, non-disclosure is "against the law."

The challenge is balancing the degree and speed of notification against the degree of understanding and awareness of the breach's severity, and how that severity affects notification procedures.

The 2009 Cost Of A Data Breach report can be downloaded here (registration required).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-0986
Published: 2015-05-26
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Moxa VPort ActiveX SDK Plus before 2.8 allow remote attackers to insert assembly-code lines via vectors involving a regkey (1) set or (2) get command.

CVE-2015-3808
Published: 2015-05-26
The dissect_lbmr_pser function in epan/dissectors/packet-lbmr.c in the LBMR dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.5 does not reject a zero length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted packet.

CVE-2015-3809
Published: 2015-05-26
The dissect_lbmr_pser function in epan/dissectors/packet-lbmr.c in the LBMR dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.5 does not properly track the current offset, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted packet.

CVE-2015-3810
Published: 2015-05-26
epan/dissectors/packet-websocket.c in the WebSocket dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.5 uses a recursive algorithm, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted packet.

CVE-2015-3811
Published: 2015-05-26
epan/dissectors/packet-wcp.c in the WCP dissector in Wireshark 1.10.x before 1.10.14 and 1.12.x before 1.12.5 improperly refers to previously processed bytes, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-...

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.