Risk
10/12/2009
11:49 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cyberwar Readiness Recast As Low Priority

Preparedness for cyberwar should have a place in U.S. defense planning, but resources are better spent on bolstering potentially vulnerable infrastructure, according to think tank RAND.

The U.S. government should not make cyberwarfare a priority investment area, according to a report from public policy think tank RAND Corp.

The report, which was underwritten by the Air Force, recommends that the government focus instead on shoring up defenses of critical infrastructure like the nation's telecommunications networks, banking systems, and power grid that may be vulnerable to cyber attack.

"Operational cyber war has an important niche role, but only that," the report states.

At best, cyberwarfare operations "can confuse and frustrate operators of military systems, and then only temporarily," the report notes. "The salient characteristics of cyberattacks--temporary effects and the way attacks impel countermeasures--suggest that they be used sparingly and precisely. Attempting a cyberattack in the hopes that success will facilitate a combat operation may be prudent; betting the operation's success on a particular set of results may not be."

The report contends that unlike regular warfare, which aims to break down enemy defenses and morale to get the other side to give in, countries often respond to cyber attacks by hardening their defenses and making them less vulnerable to future attacks. "Casualties are the chief source of the kind of war-weariness that causes nations to sue for peace when still capable of defending themselves--but no one has yet died in a cyber attack," the report says.

Further, cyber attacks often have ambiguous sources that make them difficult to retaliate against or could create new enemies if a source is misidentified. And they only temporarily disarm enemies, since computer equipment can easily be replaced.

The report warns that "non-state actors" could jump into the fray. However, it bases few of its conclusions on such scenarios, even though individuals or loose-knit groups tend to be the more obvious ongoing threat on the Internet.

Despite warnings that cyberwar may have a limited role, the report notes that some investment is appropriate.

"Operational cyberwar has the potential to contribute to warfare -- how much is unknown and, to a large extent, unknowable," it says. "Because a devastating cyber attack may facilitate or amplify physical operations and because an operational cyberwar capability is relatively inexpensive, it is worth developing."

The Air Force created a dedicated cyber command earlier this year, which became operational in August. That force includes about 6,000 active duty personnel and is expected to have an annual budget exceeding $5 billion.

Read InformationWeek's first-ever analysis of top CIOs in federal, state, and local government, and how they're embracing new expectations. Download the report here (registration required).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
DNS Threats: What Every Enterprise Should Know
Domain Name System exploits could put your data at risk. Here's some advice on how to avoid them.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Tim Wilson speaks to two experts on vulnerability research – independent consultant Jeremiah Grossman and Black Duck Software’s Mike Pittenger – about the latest wave of vulnerabilities being exploited by online attackers