Risk
1/31/2007
07:55 AM
50%
50%

Clear as Spam

Real-world case of unwanted email makes you wonder if businesses, users are on the same (Web) page

5:55 PM -- A personal experience inspired Richi Jennings, lead analyst for the email security practice at Ferris Research, to consider mistakes legitimate companies make that can label them as spammers. Jennings, who was one of the main sources in our recent story, "Seven Ways to Be Mistaken for a Spammer," recently signed up as a registered user for Dark Reading.

He says he "tagged out" of DR's newsletter because he doesn't have time to read it. But within an hour, he received a promotional email from our sister site, Light Reading. (See Seven Ways to Be Mistaken for a Spammer.)

I checked it out with our Web operations team, and they explained that when you register with DR, you initially automatically get emails about our events and services, but you can unsubscribe from them when you receive one of those messages.

Sounded clear to me. But Jennings says he had unchecked "I would like to receive information from sponsors" in his registration profile, which he says, is reflected in his profile. Yet he still got the LR mail. The reason? LR and DR are considered one big family of sites, says Warren Hultquist, LR's director of Web operations, and that's noted in our privacy policy: "www.lightreading.com, www.byteandswitch.com, www.unstrung.com, www.darkreading.com, www.cabledigitalnews.com, and www.heavyreading.com (collectively known as the 'Site.')."

(Jennings had assumed DR was sharing its client list with LR -- also known as "list repurposing" -- one of the sure-fire ways to get mislabeled a spammer.)

Tracking Jennings' story and frustrations with our Website policy made me realize that perhaps one of the problems with annoying email and mistaken spam is that not everyone looks at the opt-out process in the same way. Jennings assumed, like I'm sure other users also do, that unchecking the box would do the trick. The LR policy, however, says to unsubscribe via a link in the email message. Other users do just that.

Here's what Chris Williams, our Web development manager, says: "The link in our email takes folks to a page that automatically removes them from the list in question (this is an immediate unsubscribe). It also gives details about other lists we manage to which they may be subscribed and offers the ability to follow a link to automatically be removed from all those lists."

As for the promotions list Jennings had problems with, that doesn't show up on the subscription preferences form. It's "the price of 'free' registration with us," Williams says. That also requires you to unsubscribe -- by sending an email requesting removal, or by following the "unsubscribe" link in any email you get.

But as Jennings points out, a less patient user might report it as spam.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
DNS Threats: What Every Enterprise Should Know
Domain Name System exploits could put your data at risk. Here's some advice on how to avoid them.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.