Risk

3/30/2009
06:01 PM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

BorderWare: Dynamic Inspection Tackles Bad Site Explosion

URL filters, however robust, wall off only a small per centage of malware sites and inappropriate content. How do you keep your employees -- and your business -- from being tagged by the larger universe of dangerous sites? Filtering on the fly is BorderWare's solution.

URL filters, however robust, wall off only a small per centage of malware sites and inappropriate content. How do you keep your employees -- and your business -- from being tagged by the larger universe of dangerous sites? Filtering on the fly is BorderWare's solution.Security vendor BorderWare has introduced a new feature, Dynamic Inspection, that the company says addresses the vast number of unrecognized and unfiltered sites on the Web.

While the Websense URL database, for instance, categorizes several million known sites, there are over a trillion (with a "t") sites on the Net, and the number is growing larger by the second.

BorderWare's latest feature-add to its subscription-based e-mail and Web security platform approaches unknown Web sites your employees seek to surf to, and analyzes them for both malware infections as well as for appropriate (or, more accurately, inappropriate) categories and content, measured against the standards and restrictions established in your security/usage policy.

According to Shawn Eldridge, BorderWare vp of products and marketing, with whom I spoke recently, the real-time scanning and content analysis process is usually quick and essentially unnoticed by the user. "Large sites with lots of content take longer, of course," he says.

What's the advantage of on-the-fly inspection over traditional URL filtering?

"Both are important," Eldridge said. "But the Web is growing so rapidly that no database of URLs can keep up. Dynamic Inspection was designed to bridge that gap between known sites and the far larger number of unknown ones."

As an additional feature for the company's e-mail and Web filtering and security products, Dynamic Inspection offers an effective solution both to inadvertent encounters with risky URLs and the larger, I think, general problem of exuberantly surfing employees.

The feature is an add-on, which brings us back to a question we've looked at here before: Can your business justify the investment of thousands of dollars for filtering and Web monitoring?(BorderWare is sold through resellers, so I don't have specific per seat costs.)

Eldridge's answer was not dissimilar from others I've received:

"It depends on the nature of your IT resources," he said. "Take a look at the amount of time, personnel and money you spend on help desks and IT staff, and measure that against the cost of the service you're considering."

Fair enough: like any other business investment, you have to look at both your resources and your needs.

On the needs front, the question comes down to the volume of unwanted and potentially dangerous e-mail you're receiving throughout your organization. Get that number, then determine how much time and effort your IT staff is spending dealing with the stuff, and you'll have made a good start toward understanding the level of challenge you face, and the level of investment that challenge justifies.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Want Your Daughter to Succeed in Cyber? Call Her John
John De Santis, CEO, HyTrust,  5/16/2018
New Mexico Man Sentenced on DDoS, Gun Charges
Dark Reading Staff 5/18/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
Most enterprises are using threat intel services, but many are still figuring out how to use the data they're collecting. In this Dark Reading survey we give you a look at what they're doing today - and where they hope to go.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-11354
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-22
In Wireshark 2.6.0, the IEEE 1905.1a dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ieee1905.c by making a certain correction to string handling.
CVE-2018-11355
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-22
In Wireshark 2.6.0, the RTCP dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-rtcp.c by avoiding a buffer overflow for packet status chunks.
CVE-2018-11356
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-22
In Wireshark 2.6.0, 2.4.0 to 2.4.6, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.14, the DNS dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-dns.c by avoiding a NULL pointer dereference for an empty name in an SRV record.
CVE-2018-11357
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-22
In Wireshark 2.6.0, 2.4.0 to 2.4.6, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.14, the LTP dissector and other dissectors could consume excessive memory. This was addressed in epan/tvbuff.c by rejecting negative lengths.
CVE-2018-11358
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-22
In Wireshark 2.6.0, 2.4.0 to 2.4.6, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.14, the Q.931 dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c by avoiding a use-after-free after a malformed packet prevented certain cleanup.