Risk
5/2/2007
05:22 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Besieged E-Gold Founder Claims (Not Unconvincingly) To Be Victim Of A Fed Vendetta

Bloggers live for feedback to their controversial postings and in this regard, my entry earlier this week about a federal grand jury's decision late last week to indict E Gold Ltd, Gold & Silver Reserve Inc., and the owners of these digital currency businesses on charges of money laundering, conspiracy, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business did not disappoint. The following day, I recei

Bloggers live for feedback to their controversial postings and in this regard, my entry earlier this week about a federal grand jury's decision late last week to indict E Gold Ltd, Gold & Silver Reserve Inc., and the owners of these digital currency businesses on charges of money laundering, conspiracy, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business did not disappoint. The following day, I received an e-mailed link to E-Gold's highly articulate and well-sourced defense.E-Gold chairman Douglas Jackson believes the Justice Department, and the Secret Service in particular, has a vendetta against his company. It's less clear why the Secret Service might be manipulating information and public opinion in its efforts to bring down E-Gold and its executives, but Jackson is armed with plenty of documents that support his allegations.

In an April 24 statement, issued the same day as the federal grand jury's indictment, Jackson states that the government "knows full well that their allegations are false, yet they highlight these irresponsible and purposely damaging statements in order to demonize e-gold in the eyes of the public." He denies all of the accusations, taking particular umbrage to the Justice Department's portrayal of him and his business ventures as having turned a blind eye to payments for child pornography or for the sale of stolen identity and credit card information. Jackson then reiterates his claims that E-Gold is "the most effective of all online payment systems in detecting and interdicting abuse of its system for child pornography related payments."

Jackson points to a December 2005 court case where he says the Secret Service deceived Federal Magistrate Judge John Facciola by presenting erroneous testimony in order to obtain search and seizure warrants authorizing the government to seize U.S. bank accounts of Gold & Silver Reserve Inc. Jackson's online statement even includes a link to an e-mail that appears to indicate that he had made plans in December 2004 to visit the Secret Service in Washington, D.C., in order to brief them on how E-Gold operates. These plans, he says, were eventually cancelled by senior Secret Service management, although it's not clear based on Jackson's telling of the story why this was done.

In defense of the money laundering charges, Jackson notes that his company's OmniPay online exchange service "has for years followed stringent customer identification procedures and an absolute policy of only accepting money payments by bank wire." Further, since E-Gold doesn't accept money payments from "anyone in any form and has never owned a single dollar, yen, euro or any other brand of legacy money," it can "scarcely be construed" as a money launderer. E-Gold is a closed system, the only way to obtain e-gold is by receiving a transfer from someone who already has some, and the company maintains a permanent record of all transfers.

While Jackson's reasoning here requires first-hand knowledge of how E-Gold works to be proven, much more clear cut is E-Gold's role as founding member of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children's Financial Coalition Against Child Pornography, alongside America Online, American Express, Bank of America, PayPal, and others. Their stated goal is to eradicate the multi-billion dollar commercial child pornography by 2008. Is this a clever move by E-Gold to cover its tracks, or additional, albeit circumstantial, evidence that E-Gold is out to stop rather than encourage child porn?

An aspect of the E-Gold case that certainly warrants further examination is Jackson's allegation that the government, in investigating his company, is helping itself to the financial records of hundreds of thousands of E-Gold customers, which include American citizens as well as international organizations.

A full understanding of what's happening here (that is, what's behind the Justice Department's interest in E-Gold and whether it's justified) far exceeds the capacity of any single blog entry, particularly as the story is still unfolding. In the meantime, the Justice Department's campaign against E-Gold and that company's defense hit on some of today's most relevant security and privacy issues. These include the possibility that the online payment infrastructure that facilitates the underground cyber exchange of pilfered personal information needs to be reformed and that law enforcement needs to work with, rather than alienate, members of this infrastructure in order to beat back cyber criminals.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3409
Published: 2014-10-25
The Ethernet Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) handling feature in Cisco IOS 12.2(33)SRE9a and earlier and IOS XE 3.13S and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed CFM packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq93406.

CVE-2014-4620
Published: 2014-10-25
The EMC NetWorker Module for MEDITECH (aka NMMEDI) 3.0 build 87 through 90, when EMC RecoverPoint and Plink are used, stores cleartext RecoverPoint Appliance credentials in nsrmedisv.raw log files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading these files.

CVE-2014-4623
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar 6.0.x, 6.1.x, and 7.0.x in Avamar Data Store (ADS) GEN4(S) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE), when Password Hardening before 2.0.0.4 is enabled, uses UNIX DES crypt for password hashing, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain cleartext passwords via a brute-force a...

CVE-2014-4624
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar Data Store (ADS) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE) 6.x and 7.0.x through 7.0.2-43 do not require authentication for Java API calls, which allows remote attackers to discover grid MCUser and GSAN passwords via a crafted call.

CVE-2014-6151
Published: 2014-10-25
CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Integrated Portal (TIP) 2.2.x allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.