Risk
4/19/2011
11:41 AM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

66% Of Security Software Submitted With Flaws

App testing firm Veracode reports that developers need significantly more training on secure-coding skills.

10 Massive Security Breaches
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: 10 Massive Security Breaches
More than two-thirds of security applications and 82% of customer-focused applications initially have an unacceptable level of security quality, compared with just 58% of applications in general.

That's according to a report from Veracode, which analyzed 4,835 applications that were submitted to its application testing service.

Seeing higher numbers of vulnerabilities in security software is especially surprising, since "you're buying these applications to perform a security function, so you'd expect that these applications would be more secure than others," said Sam King, VP of product marketing for Veracode, in an interview.

The report also found that 80% of all submitted Web applications failed to mitigate the top 10 most dangerous vulnerabilities, as identified by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). Interestingly, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard also uses the OWASP top 10 list to assess compliance with the standard.

In addition, the report found that since the beginning of 2009, cross-site scripting vulnerability volume has remained constant, while SQL injection vulnerabilities have decreased by 2.4% per quarter. Unfortunately, that's not good news, since just one vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker multiple times, across multiple sites, and as numerous reports have found, the number of attacks against Web applications continue to increase.

The good news, however, is that more than 90% of all software products seen by Veracode were resubmitted and went on to achieve an acceptable quality level within a month, while security products reached an acceptable level, on average, in just three days.

That includes more than just Web applications. Overall, the applications assessed by the report were written in Java (52%), .Net (27%), C/C++ (12%), PHP (6%), and ColdFusion (2%), a mix that Veracode said reflects a typical company's application portfolio. In terms of the industries that submitted software, one-third had software designed for content management and collaboration software (33%), followed by operations (25%), security (13%), finance (12%), and customer-centric software (11%).

When it comes to coding clean software, the finance industry remains the sector to beat. Interestingly, the finance and software industries together account for more than 75% of the businesses that require their third-party software suppliers to undergo formal code evaluation. But aerospace and defense are also starting to require much more code verification of suppliers, said King.

Veracode pitches its report as a "before" picture, compared with reports that assess the damage caused by attackers who exploit software vulnerabilities, for example in the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report.

One sure-fire technique for increasing the quality of code and cutting down on data breaches is to create a secure development program with top-level backing. But the former part of that equation requires knowledge and expertise on the part of coders. In other words, they need training.

According to the report, many developers don't have secure-coding skills when they get hired, as "application security training and education is not a formal part of most computer science curriculums and certainly not a consistent theme in the professional development opportunities made available to technology professionals in companies," it said.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-1544
Published: 2014-07-23
Use-after-free vulnerability in the CERT_DestroyCertificate function in libnss3.so in Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, as used in Firefox before 31.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.7, and Thunderbird before 24.7, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that trigger cer...

CVE-2014-1547
Published: 2014-07-23
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox before 31.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.7, and Thunderbird before 24.7 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.

CVE-2014-1548
Published: 2014-07-23
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox before 31.0 and Thunderbird before 31.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.

CVE-2014-1549
Published: 2014-07-23
The mozilla::dom::AudioBufferSourceNodeEngine::CopyFromInputBuffer function in Mozilla Firefox before 31.0 and Thunderbird before 31.0 does not properly allocate Web Audio buffer memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and applica...

CVE-2014-1550
Published: 2014-07-23
Use-after-free vulnerability in the MediaInputPort class in Mozilla Firefox before 31.0 and Thunderbird before 31.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) by leveraging incorrect Web Audio control-message ordering.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Listen Now Botnet Takedowns: Who's Winning, Who's Losing
Sara Peters hosts a conversation on Botnets and those who fight them.