Risk
1/19/2011
04:25 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

4 Strategies To Lower Mobile Device Risk

Employees want their own phones, and managers want them using apps for productivity. Your problem: Secure all this.

Look around, and you'll likely agree that end-user computing is taking its most radical turn since, well, the introduction of end-user computing.

Smartphones and now the iPad and tablet computers (which create similar challenges for mobile security) are growing like mad. To put some numbers on that growth: Smartphones accounted for 46% of global mobile phone revenue in the second quarter of last year, Infonetics research finds. It estimates that two out of three mobile subscribers in developed countries will use smartphones by 2014.

Mass-market smartphone ownership is creating new expectations from employees. Apple's and Google's offerings trump the BlackBerry platform, the enterprise standard, because people think they can be both serious (for business) and fun (for me).

2010 also brought the first truly practical hyper-mobile computer--something larger than a smartphone but smaller than a PC. The iPad and its tablet followers have obvious appeal to people, many of whom are wondering if they can replace their work computer some of the time, feeding those work-anywhere, play-anywhere fantasies. This month's Consumer Electronics Show illustrates the tablet frenzy Apple ignited with its wildly successful iPad, introduced only a year ago. New tablets are promised from Motorola, Research In Motion, Samsung, Dell, and even newcomers such as TV maker Vizio. Verizon has had the iPad on its network, and now has the iPhone 4 as well.

So the competition for mobile hearts and minds and pinch-and-tap fingers is in full swing, which means your employees will be showing up with more and more new devices. Employees want access to corporate resources and data via these new devices, many of which they personally own. Of utmost concern to any compliance-minded CIO should be: Are these new computing methods putting my data at risk? The answer is likely "yes" if you're leaving device settings up to the users. As we'll discuss, the risks of both smartphones and tablets can be managed in much the same way; it's just a matter of defining your requirements, picking a capable management product, and moving forward. We'll offer four frameworks for managing the risks of these mobile devices.

But first some important context. The megatrend is a shift beyond simple e-mail on these mobile devices. First driven by the iPhone, and now by the iPad, apps are the new frontier, with enterprise examples that include CRM, virtual desktop access (check out VMware's VDI infrastructure), and specialty apps.

Apps fall into two big categories, says Ojas Rege, CEO of mobile device management (MDM) vendor MobileIron. They're either task-oriented with broad appeal, such as those for time sheets, expense reports, and conference room scheduling; or they're specialty apps for a niche audience. Some of those specialty apps are custom-coded for a company's specific business processes.

For example, Customedialabs, an interactive media agency, produces a digital sales app for the medical device and diagnostics industry. Using a client app that regularly syncs with a back-end data repository, the mobile app helps clients cover sales territories using CRM components, while trying to ensure that reps show prospects only the latest medical information. This cuts the risk of providing out-of-date material, a violation of stringent FDA Part 11 rules.

It's just one example of how, with apps, we've left the safe confines of e-mail far behind.


Become and InformationWeek Analytics subscriber and get our full report on reducing enterprise risk from mobile devices.

This report includes practical advice on charting CIO-level strategies for securing mobile devices.
Get This And All Our Reports


Previous
1 of 4
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-4594
Published: 2014-10-25
The Payment for Webform module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.5 for Drupal does not restrict access by anonymous users, which allows remote anonymous users to use the payment of other anonymous users when submitting a form that requires payment.

CVE-2014-0476
Published: 2014-10-25
The slapper function in chkrootkit before 0.50 does not properly quote file paths, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse executable. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when /tmp is not mounted with the noexec option.

CVE-2014-1927
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly quote strings, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "$(" command-substitution sequences, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1928....

CVE-2014-1928
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly escape characters, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "\" (backslash) characters to form multi-command sequences, a different vulner...

CVE-2014-1929
Published: 2014-10-25
python-gnupg 0.3.5 and 0.3.6 allows context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via vectors related to "option injection through positional arguments." NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-7323.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.