Perimeter
1/27/2015
04:35 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Half Of Enterprises Worldwide Hit By DDoS Attacks, Report Says

New data illustrates how distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks remain a popular attack weapon -- and continue to evolve.

If you still think distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks are merely old-school, outdated, pain in the neck disruption campaigns waged by hacktivists or script kiddies, think again: about half of all enterprises were hit with a DDoS attack last year and most ISPs and enterprises also suffered more stealthy DDoS attacks aimed at flying under the radar.

Some 90% of ISP and enterprise respondents in Arbor Networks' 10th Annual Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report say they experienced application-layer (versus network connection-sapping) DDoS attacks, and 42% say they were hit by DDoS attacks that used a combination of bandwidth-sapping, application-layer, and state exhaustion methods. HTTP- and DNS are the top two targets of application-layer attacks, according to the report, which was released today.

But so-called volumetric attacks, which bombard a targeted organization or ISP's network connections, still outnumber application-layer attacks, accounting for about two-thirds of all DDoS attacks in the past year. DDoS attacks are also becoming more frequent:  38% say they had been hit by more than 21 DDoS attacks per month in 2014, twice the number of organizations as in 2013.

The biggest DDoS attack in 2014 came in at a whopping 400 gigabits-per-second, according to Arbor. That's a far cry from the record-breaking 8Gbps when Arbor did its first report 10 years ago.

It's not all that's changed in DDoS attacks. "Application layer attacks weren't even a topic of discussion 10 years ago. That's a huge shift," says Gary Sockrider, solutions architect at Arbor Networks.

Application-layer attacks aim to overwhelm a server's resources, rather than the Internet pipe, and they operate "low and slow" to go undetected until it's too late. "If you have an application running on a server behind a 10Gig Internet connection, you could have something using only 1% of that pipe, and a 10 meg attack could exhaust the server resources," Sockrider says.

These attacks are often successful because many DDoS detection technologies can't see upper-layer application-layer traffic anomalies, and if they do, it may not be enough to trigger an alarm, he says. "They tend to be combined with volumetric attacks, which set off an alarm. While you are reacting to that, the application layer attack is sneaking through," so it can be used as a distraction for the real attack, he says.

According to Arbor's report, hacktivism isn't the number one motive for a DDoS anymore:  37% of these types of attacks are disputes between crime gangs; 36% stem from competitive rivalry between businesses or gamers; 34% from flash crowds or hacktivism; 28% for hiding data exfiltration or other compromises; 25% for financial market manipulation; and 24% for extortion purposes.

But not all anti-DDoS vendors are seeing a jump in app-layer DDoS attacks. David Fernandez, head of the Akamai PLXsert team, says while Akamai sees DDoS attacks overall on the rise, there has been a decline in application-layer DDoS attacks. In the fourth quarter of 2014, Akamai saw application-layer attacks accounting for about 10% of all DDoS attacks, and infrastructure/volumetric attacks making up nearly 90% of them.

"The dramatic increase in overall DDoS attacks mitigated in Q4 2014 is an example of how attackers considered this attack type a primary vector in their arsenal," Fernandez says. "New attack types and increased sophistication are always becoming more apparent."

Meanwhile, Arbor's data syncs with DDoS trends Incapsula is seeing, says Igal Zeifman product evangelist at Incapsula. His firm's research shows 45% of all businesses have been hit with a  DDoS attack at least once in the past year. "Any time you see a large number like 90 percent, it sounds high, but being hit by a cyberattack has become a part of doing business online," Zeifman says.

Not surprisingly, cloud services are being targeted as well. More than 25% of ISPs and enterprises surveyed by Arbor report seeing cloud services being targeted by DDoS campaigns. And more than one-third of data center operators say they were hit by a DDoS that sapped their Internet bandwidth, and 44% of data centers experienced revenue loss from a DDoS attack.

Arbor's report draws some 287 respondent organizations, including ISPs, hosting and mobie providers, as well as enterprises worldwide. Around 60% were service providers, and 30% enterprises, education, and government organizations.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
100%
0%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
1/28/2015 | 3:17:44 PM
Re: Mult-Vector vs Volumetric
Hi @RyanSepe. Arbor's report shows DNS amplfication attacks dropping a bit in 2014, and NTP attacks rising. SSDP also rose last year. 



RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/28/2015 | 3:03:36 PM
Mult-Vector vs Volumetric
The reason you will see the most prevalent means of ddos attacks as some type of flooding is because it takes less expertise for the attacker to pull off. Essentially, because its easier is why there are more instances of this. However, because this attack is more easily mitigated you will see enterprises that are attacked using this method restoring their technology services in a fraction of the time it takes for an enterprise to recover from a multi-vector attack.

As stated in the article these attacks are difficult to mitigate. They can attack multiple layers and because of this the time it takes an enterprise to restore functionality increases as well.

DNS based attacks were extremely prevalent in 2013 for their amplification and anonymity factors. I am interested to see how they were represented in 2014.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How To Build An Effective Defense Against Ransomware
A compendium of Dark Reading´s best recent coverage of ransomware attacks, as well as best practices for defending your enterprise against them.
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Tim Wilson speaks to two experts on vulnerability research – independent consultant Jeremiah Grossman and Black Duck Software’s Mike Pittenger – about the latest wave of vulnerabilities being exploited by online attackers